Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This paper advances theoretical frameworks in machine learning by extending incentive-compatible exploration beyond standard Bayesian assumptions and full-information settings. It addresses critical gaps where agents possess external information unknown to the principal, introducing robust definitions for action selection under uncertainty without a common prior. The work is significant for researchers developing algorithms that must function reliably in complex, partially observable environments with strategic agents.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

On Incentivized Exploration beyond Bayesianism and Full-Information

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2607.18300v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We extend Incentive Compatible Exploration beyond the Bayesian full-information setting of Kremer et al. [2014]. We consider agents that may possess external information unknown to the principal. We show such settings require new notions of incentivized exploration, as well as going beyond a Bayesian perspective, and we introduce a definition where agents choose any reasonable (undominated) action. Furthermore, our framework provides for a more robust treatment of ties, and extends to settings where agents lack a single common prior and instead only know that reward distributions belong to a collection of potential priors.

Abstract:We extend Incentive Compatible Exploration beyond the Bayesian full-information setting of Kremer et al. [2014]. We consider agents that may possess external information unknown to the principal. We show such settings require new notions of incentivized exploration, as well as going beyond a Bayesian perspective, and we introduce a definition where agents choose any reasonable (undominated) action. Furthermore, our framework provides for a more robust treatment of ties, and extends to settings where agents lack a single common prior and instead only know that reward distributions belong to a collection of potential priors.

Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2607.18300 [cs.GT]

(or arXiv:2607.18300v1 [cs.GT] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.18300 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 191 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe