analiza aiqbench
This research directly addresses the class imbalance challenges in deep learning models used for melanoma diagnosis by evaluating specific loss function modifications. The study demonstrates that focal loss effectively balances high AUC performance with improved uncertainty calibration, offering a practical optimization strategy for medical imaging applications.
On Impact of Loss Function on the Performance of Neural Networks in Melanoma Diagnosis
arXiv:2610.06139v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Melanoma is the deadliest type of skin cancer, whose early diagnosis is crucial for patients' survival. Image classification using deep learning models has shown promising results for melanoma diagnosis. However, the performance of these models on the melanoma datasets such as SIIM-ISIC melanoma classification dataset is a challenge due to the class imbalance. One of the methods to deal with this challenge is using loss function modifications. In this work, we have investigated the effect of different loss functions on the performance of deep neural networks. We trained these networks using focal loss, logit-adjusted softmax cross-entropy (CE) loss, and weighted softmax CE loss, and we report different metrics for evaluating performance and uncertainty calibration. Our results suggest that focal loss delivers a good combination of performance in terms of AUC and uncertainty calibration in terms of expected calibration error (ECE) simultaneously.
Abstract:Melanoma is the deadliest type of skin cancer, whose early diagnosis is crucial for patients' survival. Image classification using deep learning models has shown promising results for melanoma diagnosis. However, the performance of these models on the melanoma datasets such as SIIM-ISIC melanoma classification dataset is a challenge due to the class imbalance. One of the methods to deal with this challenge is using loss function modifications. In this work, we have investigated the effect of different loss functions on the performance of deep neural networks. We trained these networks using focal loss, logit-adjusted softmax cross-entropy (CE) loss, and weighted softmax CE loss, and we report different metrics for evaluating performance and uncertainty calibration. Our results suggest that focal loss delivers a good combination of performance in terms of AUC and uncertainty calibration in terms of expected calibration error (ECE) simultaneously.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.06139 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.06139v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.06139 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 244 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Handling Imbalanced Classification: What Works Better Than SMOTE
Analytics Vidhya · 12 iul. 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · 17 oct. 2026

How do neural networks regress cubic polynomials? Apparently, they use a trick invented in Milan 500 years ago
LessWrong · 22 iul. 2026

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · 17 sept. 2026