Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchProduse AI

analiza aiqbench

This research introduces TANav, a navigation system that uses tactile probing and force analysis to estimate object mass and authorize handling decisions without relying solely on visual data. By integrating physics-aware sensing with a repeated-patrol planner, the approach significantly reduces missed pushes and boundary violations in simulated environments compared to standard RGB-D or peak-force methods. The work demonstrates practical advances in robotic manipulation safety and efficiency through direct physical interaction rather than passive observation.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Nudge Before You Push: Physics-Aware Navigation via Tactile Probing

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2610.04924v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Visually identical containers can conceal loads that require different handling decisions. We present TANav, which uses a brief nudge to measure push resistance for navigation under a site-defined handling boundary. TacPhys reads the force sequence, with optional RGB-D and kinematics, into a mass estimate for push authorization. A repeated-patrol planner weighs probe and route costs, requests a second contact when useful, and reuses observations across visits. In simulation, TacPhys approaches a resistance-only Bayes reference and reduces missed pushes from 28.7% to 5.5% relative to peak-force thresholding at comparable low-risk operating points. In repeated-patrol simulation, TANav recovers 90% of the oracle's path saving, more than halves human interventions relative to always-detour, and reduces boundary violations from 4.3% to 2.9% relative to RGB-D-only probing. On a quadruped manipulator with a Hall-array fingertip, offline zero-shot MAE is 0.28-1.07 kg on containers up to 2.82 kg. Force-rise calibration at 3 kg gives 93.5% pooled offline accuracy (86.4% on non-cube episodes); a separate raw-peak rule gives 15 of 20 correct online decisions on unseen boxes.

Abstract:Visually identical containers can conceal loads that require different handling decisions. We present TANav, which uses a brief nudge to measure push resistance for navigation under a site-defined handling boundary. TacPhys reads the force sequence, with optional RGB-D and kinematics, into a mass estimate for push authorization. A repeated-patrol planner weighs probe and route costs, requests a second contact when useful, and reuses observations across visits. In simulation, TacPhys approaches a resistance-only Bayes reference and reduces missed pushes from 28.7% to 5.5% relative to peak-force thresholding at comparable low-risk operating points. In repeated-patrol simulation, TANav recovers 90% of the oracle's path saving, more than halves human interventions relative to always-detour, and reduces boundary violations from 4.3% to 2.9% relative to RGB-D-only probing. On a quadruped manipulator with a Hall-array fingertip, offline zero-shot MAE is 0.28-1.07 kg on containers up to 2.82 kg. Force-rise calibration at 3 kg gives 93.5% pooled offline accuracy (86.4% on non-cube episodes); a separate raw-peak rule gives 15 of 20 correct online decisions on unseen boxes.

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2610.04924 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2610.04924v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.04924 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 263 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe