analiza aiqbench
This paper establishes nuclear many-body systems as rigorous benchmarks for quantum algorithms, mapping realistic Hamiltonians like chiral effective field theory onto qubit architectures to evaluate resource costs across different eigenvalue methods. By quantifying T-gate requirements and scaling trends using primitives such as Qubitization and Quantum Singular Value Transformation, the study provides a standardized framework for comparing computational approaches in complex many-body physics problems. The accompanying NuQuLib software stack offers concrete tools for researchers aiming to validate quantum advantage on specific scientific workloads.
Nuclear Many-Body Systems as Benchmarks for Quantum Computing
arXiv:2607.08047v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We present a framework for benchmarking quantum algorithms for nuclear many-body systems based on realistic nuclear Hamiltonians such as chiral effective field theory. To this end, we introduce a workflow that maps nuclear interactions in second quantization formalism to qubit Hamiltonians. This enables the systematic construction of benchmark instances spanning no-core and valence-space formulations with two-body (NN) and selected three-body (3N) interactions. Then, we proceed to provide resource estimates for three representative eigenvalue algorithms: Quantum Phase Estimation, Quantum Krylov methods, and Observable Dynamic Mode Decomposition. We compare their resource requirements in terms of T-gate counts and system size, and examine the impact of model-space choices and many-body interactions. The primitives included in our analysis are Trotterization, Qubitization, and Quantum Singular Value Transformation. Our results quantify scaling trends across algorithms and problem classes, and provide a basis for consistent comparisons of quantum approaches to nuclear many-body problems. The implementation is provided by the NuQuLib software stack.
Abstract:We present a framework for benchmarking quantum algorithms for nuclear many-body systems based on realistic nuclear Hamiltonians such as chiral effective field theory. To this end, we introduce a workflow that maps nuclear interactions in second quantization formalism to qubit Hamiltonians. This enables the systematic construction of benchmark instances spanning no-core and valence-space formulations with two-body (NN) and selected three-body (3N) interactions. Then, we proceed to provide resource estimates for three representative eigenvalue algorithms: Quantum Phase Estimation, Quantum Krylov methods, and Observable Dynamic Mode Decomposition. We compare their resource requirements in terms of T-gate counts and system size, and examine the impact of model-space choices and many-body interactions. The primitives included in our analysis are Trotterization, Qubitization, and Quantum Singular Value Transformation. Our results quantify scaling trends across algorithms and problem classes, and provide a basis for consistent comparisons of quantum approaches to nuclear many-body problems. The implementation is provided by the NuQuLib software stack.
arXiv:2607.08047 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2607.08047v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.08047 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 244 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · 31 iul. 2026

Quantum Annealing Tackles Complex Nuclear Physics Calculations
Quantum Zeitgeist · 8 iun. 2026

Researchers Map Nuclei Using Fewer Qubits with Quantum Algorithm
Quantum Zeitgeist · 4 iun. 2026

CEH Reduction Trades Sign Reweighting for Active-Space Accuracy
Quantum Zeitgeist · 20 aug. 2026