Nous: Learning and Certifying Memory Decisions Before Source Calibration

Abstract:Belief-based agent memory needs reliable decisions about current state, yet its evidence may be noisy, copied, or stale. Must a memory calibrate its sources before it can improve its decisions? We separate learning, calibration, and revision certification. On one four-model hidden Markov family, learning an unknown Bayes decision requires Theta(l^-2) records and certifying its improvement over an informative incumbent takes O(l^-2) fresh records from the same observation law, while fixed-precision source estimation requires Theta(l^-4) as persistence l vanishes. Thus learning and certifying useful decisions can require quadratically fewer records than source calibration. A broader model class retains the decision rate and source lower bound. Under an unknown identity-plus-background report channel, we characterize the sharp identified interval for policy improvement and derive a finite-sample certificate using observable witness regions, without pure-class anchors. A robustness extension tolerates bounded history-dependent misspecification and conditional copying; split-trained witnesses apply to arbitrary history spaces with explicit power conditions. We integrate policy-bound receipts with Nous Dimensions and test 45,000 held-out mutable-state histories and 9,000 episodes in three external MiniGrid memory environments with an introduced noisy-report interface. The new certificate accepts 9/9 improvements over a constant incumbent and 4/9 over last-write-wins, versus none for the earlier certificate in MiniGrid. Strong established inference baselines remain competitive or better. The result is a statistical account of when memory decisions can be learned and justified without recovering source reliability, not a universally superior memory algorithm.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2610.00094 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.00094v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.00094 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.