analiza aiqbench
This paper identifies a critical safety gap where automatic sign language translation models, untrained on minors, can inadvertently bypass child-protection filters by altering semantic nuances like negation or help-seeking urgency. The authors propose a Deaf-informed audit framework to evaluate these risks before deployment, highlighting the need for joint evaluation of SLT systems and trust-and-safety tooling.
Not What a Child Expressed: Auditing the Sign-to-Text Safety Interface in Child-Facing AI
arXiv:2610.07519v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automatic sign language translation (SLT) has entered consumer products, turning American Sign Language into English text for dictation, messaging, and queries put to a conversational assistant. Child-facing AI and platform trust-and-safety tooling decide on text, using filters on minor accounts and grooming classifiers that score chat messages. A signing child who uses SLT therefore reaches these safeguards through a translation. We found no publicly documented system in which the two have been jointly evaluated, and the leading deployed SLT model was neither trained nor formally evaluated on signers under 18. Errors that alter negation, participant roles, secrecy, urgency or help-seeking could change a safety decision without disturbing fluency. This paper proposes a Deaf-informed pre-deployment audit of that boundary, with a failure taxonomy, a sanitised scenario schema, four comparison conditions, and four outcome measures. Auslan is the planned first case study.
Abstract:Automatic sign language translation (SLT) has entered consumer products, turning American Sign Language into English text for dictation, messaging, and queries put to a conversational assistant. Child-facing AI and platform trust-and-safety tooling decide on text, using filters on minor accounts and grooming classifiers that score chat messages. A signing child who uses SLT therefore reaches these safeguards through a translation. We found no publicly documented system in which the two have been jointly evaluated, and the leading deployed SLT model was neither trained nor formally evaluated on signers under 18. Errors that alter negation, participant roles, secrecy, urgency or help-seeking could change a safety decision without disturbing fluency. This paper proposes a Deaf-informed pre-deployment audit of that boundary, with a failure taxonomy, a sanitised scenario schema, four comparison conditions, and four outcome measures. Auslan is the planned first case study.
5 pages, 1 figure. Accepted as a poster at the NeurIPS 2026 Workshop on Child Safety in AI (non-archival)
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
arXiv:2610.07519 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.07519v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.07519 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 262 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
[AINews] AI Engineer NYC: Gemini 4 Argon, Vals AI Benchmarks
Latent Space · 14 oct. 2026

The SaaSpocalypse that wasn’t, with Atlassian CEO Mike Cannon-Brookes
The Verge · 28 sept. 2026
Do AI models assist with human rights violations?
LessWrong · 29 sept. 2026
Biological Superintelligence
LessWrong · 30 iul. 2026