analiza aiqbench
This paper addresses non-stationary inventory control problems where demand distributions shift over time, proposing adaptive online algorithms optimized against base-stock policies. By leveraging convexity and one-sided feedback structures, the research establishes dynamic regret guarantees that match stationary learning rates in zero lead-time scenarios while highlighting performance limitations introduced by delayed replenishment under lost-sales conditions. The work advances theoretical machine learning applications to stochastic optimization, specifically focusing on counterfactual policy evaluation despite demand censoring.
Non-Stationary Inventory Control with Lead Times
arXiv:2602.05799v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study non-stationary single-item, periodic-review inventory control problems in which the demand distribution is unknown and may change over time. We analyze how demand non-stationarity affects learning performance across inventory models, including systems with demand backlogging or lost-sales, both with and without lead times. For each setting, we propose an adaptive online algorithm that optimizes over the class of base-stock policies and establish performance guarantees in terms of dynamic regret relative to the optimal base-stock policy at each time step. The algorithms leverage the convexity and one-sided feedback structure of inventory costs to enable counterfactual policy evaluation despite demand censoring. In backlogging systems and lost-sales models with zero lead time, our algorithms adapt to unknown demand changes while matching, up to logarithmic factors, the rates known for the corresponding stationary learning problems. In lost-sales systems with positive lead times, the combination of demand censoring and delayed replenishment restricts counterfactual policy evaluation and leads to weaker regret guarantees. We complement the theoretical analysis with simulation results showing that our methods significantly outperform existing non-oracle benchmarks.
Abstract:We study non-stationary single-item, periodic-review inventory control problems in which the demand distribution is unknown and may change over time. We analyze how demand non-stationarity affects learning performance across inventory models, including systems with demand backlogging or lost-sales, both with and without lead times. For each setting, we propose an adaptive online algorithm that optimizes over the class of base-stock policies and establish performance guarantees in terms of dynamic regret relative to the optimal base-stock policy at each time step. The algorithms leverage the convexity and one-sided feedback structure of inventory costs to enable counterfactual policy evaluation despite demand censoring. In backlogging systems and lost-sales models with zero lead time, our algorithms adapt to unknown demand changes while matching, up to logarithmic factors, the rates known for the corresponding stationary learning problems. In lost-sales systems with positive lead times, the combination of demand censoring and delayed replenishment restricts counterfactual policy evaluation and leads to weaker regret guarantees. We complement the theoretical analysis with simulation results showing that our methods significantly outperform existing non-oracle benchmarks.
Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2602.05799 [math.OC]
(or arXiv:2602.05799v2 [math.OC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.05799 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 273 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Why I Left Google DeepMind
LessWrong · 15 iul. 2026

Forbes Asia 100 To Watch 2026
forbes.com · 24 aug. 2026

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · 27 aug. 2026

Podcast: Securing AI Agents: Identity, Authorization, and the DPACT Framework
InfoQ · 21 sept. 2026