analiza aiqbench
This paper introduces NeSyAM, a neurosymbolic framework designed to learn action models for AI planning under partial observability, addressing a critical gap where existing methods fail due to incomplete visual traces. By unifying theoretical analysis with extensive testing across multiple domains, the study demonstrates how agents can effectively infer world dynamics even when some state information is missing or uninformative. This advancement strengthens the robustness of autonomous systems operating in real-world environments where full observability cannot be guaranteed.
Neurosymbolic Action Model Learning under Partial Observability
arXiv:2609.25766v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI planning studies how an agent can reach a goal by executing a sequence of actions. To plan correctly, the agent needs an action model describing when each action can be executed and how it changes the world. Constructing such models by hand requires domain expertise, and can be costly and error-prone. Action models can instead be learned from available data using existing neurosymbolic approaches, but they currently assume access to complete traces of fully observable images . These approaches fail to learn action models under partial observability where some of the images might not be present or are not fully informative of the current state of the world. Hence, this paper proposes NeSyAM, a novel neurosymbolic modeling paradigm for action model learning under partial observability. In addition, the paper presents a unified variational framework for theoretically analysing the limitations of existing methods compared to our proposed approach. NeSyAM is then tested extensively on six visual planning domains and three observation regimes to show it consistently recovers relevant parts of the true action model under partial observability.
Abstract:AI planning studies how an agent can reach a goal by executing a sequence of actions. To plan correctly, the agent needs an action model describing when each action can be executed and how it changes the world. Constructing such models by hand requires domain expertise, and can be costly and error-prone. Action models can instead be learned from available data using existing neurosymbolic approaches, but they currently assume access to complete traces of fully observable images . These approaches fail to learn action models under partial observability where some of the images might not be present or are not fully informative of the current state of the world. Hence, this paper proposes NeSyAM, a novel neurosymbolic modeling paradigm for action model learning under partial observability. In addition, the paper presents a unified variational framework for theoretically analysing the limitations of existing methods compared to our proposed approach. NeSyAM is then tested extensively on six visual planning domains and three observation regimes to show it consistently recovers relevant parts of the true action model under partial observability.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.25766 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.25766v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.25766 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 271 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · 5 oct. 2026
Toward Learning POMDPs Beyond Full-Rank Actions and State Observability
arXiv · 23 iul. 2026

GLM-5.3 Sometimes Considers How Train-Time Actions Shape Future Behavior
LessWrong · 15 oct. 2026

Projection sampling preserves capabilities but diminishes gains from alignment fine-tuning
LessWrong · 16 oct. 2026