Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This study establishes rigorous baselines for molecular fingerprint prediction by demonstrating that simple nearest-neighbour retrieval methods can match or exceed current deep learning models on MS/MS spectra. By systematically comparing variants based on differing inference assumptions, the work provides a critical benchmark to prevent overestimating progress in this specific domain of computational chemistry and machine learning.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Nearest-neighbour baselines for fingerprint prediction from MS/MS spectra under different assumptions

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2610.02249v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: It has recently been shown that nearest-neighbour retrieval provides a strong baseline for molecular fingerprint prediction from MS/MS spectra, with several variants matching or outperforming current deep learning models (Khoo and Barzilay, 2026; Liu et al., 2026; Gupta et al., 2026). Importantly, "nearest neighbour" encompasses a family of retrieval methods that differ in the information assumed to be available at inference. In this report, we systematically compare several nearest-neighbour variants and show how these differing assumptions affect performance. Our goal is to establish stricter baselines that enable more rigorous benchmarking and better measure progress in this area.

Abstract:It has recently been shown that nearest-neighbour retrieval provides a strong baseline for molecular fingerprint prediction from MS/MS spectra, with several variants matching or outperforming current deep learning models (Khoo and Barzilay, 2026; Liu et al., 2026; Gupta et al., 2026). Importantly, "nearest neighbour" encompasses a family of retrieval methods that differ in the information assumed to be available at inference. In this report, we systematically compare several nearest-neighbour variants and show how these differing assumptions affect performance. Our goal is to establish stricter baselines that enable more rigorous benchmarking and better measure progress in this area.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.CE); Machine Learning (stat.ML)

arXiv:2610.02249 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.02249v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.02249 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 198 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe