Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCalcul cuantic

analiza aiqbench

This research establishes near-optimal quantum query lower bounds for bipartiteness and expansion testing in bounded-degree graphs, resolving a decade-long open question regarding the limits of quantum speedup for these canonical property testing problems. By proving that $\widetilde{\Omega}(N^{1/3})$ queries are necessary, the authors demonstrate that the polynomial advantage previously achieved by Ambainis, Childs, and Liu is essentially tight, closing the gap between known algorithms and theoretical limits. This work provides a definitive characterization of quantum query complexity for these specific graph properties within the bounded-degree model.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Near-optimal quantum query lower bounds on bipartiteness and expansion testing in the bounded-degree graph model

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2610.01752v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this work, we study bipartiteness and expansion testing, two canonical problems in graph property testing in the bounded-degree model through the lens of quantum query complexity. In the classical setting, it is known that $\widetilde{\Theta}(\sqrt{N})$ queries are necessary and sufficient for both these testing problems (Goldreich and Ron, 1999, 2000 & 2002), where $N$ denotes the number of vertices of the input graph. Due to their significance, (Ambainis, Childs, and Liu, 2011) initiated the study of these problems in the quantum setting and designed quantum algorithms for bipartiteness and expansion testing that perform $\widetilde{O}(N^{1/3})$ queries, showing a polynomial speedup. They also proved that $\widetilde{\Omega}(N^{1/4})$ queries are necessary for expansion testing, but the possibility of an exponential quantum advantage for bipartiteness testing remained open. Despite significant effort, there has been no improvement in these results in the last decade and a half. In this work, we prove essentially tight $\widetilde{\Omega}(N^{1/3})$ quantum query lower bounds for both bipartiteness and expansion testing, thereby completely characterizing the quantum query complexity of these problems up to polylogarithmic factors. While our proofs use the polynomial method similarly to Ambainis, Childs, and Liu, we use intermediate problems that we relate to the main problems via reductions, and perform a more precise analysis of the resulting polynomials, leading to the near-optimal lower bounds.

Abstract:In this work, we study bipartiteness and expansion testing, two canonical problems in graph property testing in the bounded-degree model through the lens of quantum query complexity. In the classical setting, it is known that $\widetilde{\Theta}(\sqrt{N})$ queries are necessary and sufficient for both these testing problems (Goldreich and Ron, 1999, 2000 & 2002), where $N$ denotes the number of vertices of the input graph. Due to their significance, (Ambainis, Childs, and Liu, 2011) initiated the study of these problems in the quantum setting and designed quantum algorithms for bipartiteness and expansion testing that perform $\widetilde{O}(N^{1/3})$ queries, showing a polynomial speedup. They also proved that $\widetilde{\Omega}(N^{1/4})$ queries are necessary for expansion testing, but the possibility of an exponential quantum advantage for bipartiteness testing remained open. Despite significant effort, there has been no improvement in these results in the last decade and a half. In this work, we prove essentially tight $\widetilde{\Omega}(N^{1/3})$ quantum query lower bounds for both bipartiteness and expansion testing, thereby completely characterizing the quantum query complexity of these problems up to polylogarithmic factors. While our proofs use the polynomial method similarly to Ambainis, Childs, and Liu, we use intermediate problems that we relate to the main problems via reductions, and perform a more precise analysis of the resulting polynomials, leading to the near-optimal lower bounds.

Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS)

arXiv:2610.01752 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2610.01752v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.01752 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 315 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe