analiza aiqbench
The MUSE benchmark addresses a critical gap in evaluating large vision-language models specifically for artistic and multicultural educational contexts, moving beyond standard real-world image datasets. By decoupling annotation from question generation, this study provides a robust framework to assess how well AI systems interpret semantic, affective, and cultural nuances in situated learning environments. The findings highlight significant disparities between open-source and proprietary models, particularly in compositional reasoning and emotional interpretation, offering clear directions for improving trustworthy multi-modal AI in education.
MUSE: Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models on Multi-Modal Understanding in Situated Education
arXiv:2609.19088v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large vision-language models have achieved remarkable progress in multi-modal understanding, yet their capabilities in educational settings remain insufficiently evaluated. In AI-assisted language learning, models must interpret artistic imagery, understand its semantic, affective, and cultural content, and reason about visual context to support meaningful interaction. However, existing benchmarks primarily focus on real-world images or domain-specific educational reasoning, providing limited coverage of artistic educational content. To address this gap, we introduce MUSE, a benchmark for evaluating large vision-language models on artistic image understanding in situated educational applications. MUSE decouples image annotation from question generation, enabling diverse tasks with controllable difficulty while reducing annotation effort. It comprises twelve tasks spanning visual perception, semantic and affective interpretation, culture understanding, and compositional reasoning, together with diverse artistic images deliberately curated to center Singaporean and Southeast Asian multicultural contexts alongside Western art traditions, covering multiple themes and difficulty levels. Evaluation of open-source and proprietary models reveals substantial disparities across capability dimensions, particularly in affective interpretation and compositional reasoning. Our analysis further identifies common failure modes and key challenges for developing trustworthy multi-modal models for education. We hope MUSE will serve as a standardized benchmark for advancing multi-modal understanding in situated educational applications.
Abstract:Large vision-language models have achieved remarkable progress in multi-modal understanding, yet their capabilities in educational settings remain insufficiently evaluated. In AI-assisted language learning, models must interpret artistic imagery, understand its semantic, affective, and cultural content, and reason about visual context to support meaningful interaction. However, existing benchmarks primarily focus on real-world images or domain-specific educational reasoning, providing limited coverage of artistic educational content. To address this gap, we introduce MUSE, a benchmark for evaluating large vision-language models on artistic image understanding in situated educational applications. MUSE decouples image annotation from question generation, enabling diverse tasks with controllable difficulty while reducing annotation effort. It comprises twelve tasks spanning visual perception, semantic and affective interpretation, culture understanding, and compositional reasoning, together with diverse artistic images deliberately curated to center Singaporean and Southeast Asian multicultural contexts alongside Western art traditions, covering multiple themes and difficulty levels. Evaluation of open-source and proprietary models reveals substantial disparities across capability dimensions, particularly in affective interpretation and compositional reasoning. Our analysis further identifies common failure modes and key challenges for developing trustworthy multi-modal models for education. We hope MUSE will serve as a standardized benchmark for advancing multi-modal understanding in situated educational applications.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
arXiv:2609.19088 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.19088v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.19088 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 300 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · 17 oct. 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 10 sept. 2026
[AINews] AI Engineer NYC: Gemini 4 Argon, Vals AI Benchmarks
Latent Space · 14 oct. 2026

[AINews] The Future of Latent Space
Latent Space · 25 sept. 2026