Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This research advances multimodal deep learning for small-molecule structure identification by integrating domain-specific spectroscopic knowledge into mixed-condition training protocols. The study demonstrates that handling missing or degraded spectral data through tailored perturbations and mixture-of-experts fusion significantly boosts model robustness, particularly in scenarios relying on single-modality inputs like IR or MS. These findings offer a practical framework for improving the reliability of AI-driven chemical characterization tools under real-world data limitations.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Multimodal deep learning from spectra for small-molecule structure identification: enhancing robustness with mixed-condition training

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2609.14360v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In practical molecular characterization, small-molecule structure identification benefits from complementary spectroscopic evidence, but missing, degraded, or mismatched spectra challenge multimodal models. Herein, we incorporate domain knowledge from spectroscopy and chemistry into mixed-condition training for candidate structure reranking, using a reproducible evaluation protocol and mixture-of-experts (MoE) fusion. The protocol incorporates perturbations tailored to each spectroscopic modality and chemically informed spectrum replacements to cover variations in spectral availability, quality, and consistency. A total of 79,462 test samples were evaluated across 30 predefined conditions using simulated spectra from the Multimodal Spectroscopic Dataset (MSSD) for mass spectrometry (MS), infrared (IR) spectroscopy, and 1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), with up to 128 hard candidate structures per sample. A controlled two-by-two factorial comparison of complete-input training versus mixed-condition training and vanilla concatenation versus MoE fusion, with matched evaluation conditions, showed that mixed-condition training provided the main gains in both architectures. For MoE, mean reciprocal rank (MRR), averaged equally across conditions, increased from 0.9203 to 0.9763, a relative increase of 6.08%. Recall at rank 1 (R@1), averaged over the same conditions, increased from 89.50% to 96.36%, an increase of 6.86 percentage points and a relative increase of 7.67%. IR-only and MS/MS-only MRR increased from 0.4337 to 0.9307 and from 0.3711 to 0.8575, reaching 2.15 and 2.31 times their respective baseline values, while complete-input performance remained high. These results support integrating domain knowledge into training-condition design to improve robustness, with further gains from MoE under mixed-condition training.

Abstract:In practical molecular characterization, small-molecule structure identification benefits from complementary spectroscopic evidence, but missing, degraded, or mismatched spectra challenge multimodal models. Herein, we incorporate domain knowledge from spectroscopy and chemistry into mixed-condition training for candidate structure reranking, using a reproducible evaluation protocol and mixture-of-experts (MoE) fusion. The protocol incorporates perturbations tailored to each spectroscopic modality and chemically informed spectrum replacements to cover variations in spectral availability, quality, and consistency. A total of 79,462 test samples were evaluated across 30 predefined conditions using simulated spectra from the Multimodal Spectroscopic Dataset (MSSD) for mass spectrometry (MS), infrared (IR) spectroscopy, and 1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), with up to 128 hard candidate structures per sample. A controlled two-by-two factorial comparison of complete-input training versus mixed-condition training and vanilla concatenation versus MoE fusion, with matched evaluation conditions, showed that mixed-condition training provided the main gains in both architectures. For MoE, mean reciprocal rank (MRR), averaged equally across conditions, increased from 0.9203 to 0.9763, a relative increase of 6.08%. Recall at rank 1 (R@1), averaged over the same conditions, increased from 89.50% to 96.36%, an increase of 6.86 percentage points and a relative increase of 7.67%. IR-only and MS/MS-only MRR increased from 0.4337 to 0.9307 and from 0.3711 to 0.8575, reaching 2.15 and 2.31 times their respective baseline values, while complete-input performance remained high. These results support integrating domain knowledge into training-condition design to improve robustness, with further gains from MoE under mixed-condition training.

16 pages, 7 figures, 3 tables. Supplementary information: 17 pages, 5 figures and 10 tables, provided as an ancillary PDF. Preprint

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.14360 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.14360v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.14360 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

supplementary.pdf

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 357 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe