analiza aiqbench
This paper introduces MRMAD, a novel benchmark designed to test whether large audio-language models can reliably perceive and reason about acoustic degradations across multiple dialogue turns. The study reveals that while current models excel at semantic understanding, they frequently fail to diagnose or compare the severity of audio corruption, highlighting a critical gap in robustness for real-world applications. By establishing a diagnostic foundation for these limitations, this work directly advances the evaluation standards necessary for building more resilient AI audio systems.
MRMAD: A Multi-Round Multi-Audio Benchmark for Evaluating Acoustic Degradation Perception in Large Audio-Language Models
arXiv:2608.22236v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large audio-language models (LALMs) have shown promising progress in understanding speech, music, and general sound events, yet their ability to reason about how audio signals are degraded remains underexplored. Existing benchmarks primarily evaluate semantic understanding, event recognition, or high-level audio reasoning, leaving a basic question unanswered: Do LALMs understand the differences in audio quality? We introduce MRMAD, a Multi-Round Multi-Audio Degradation benchmark for evaluating audio degradation perception and understanding in LALMs. MRMAD spans speech, music, and sound, and frames evaluation as multi-turn dialogues over multiple audio inputs, requiring models to identify degradation types, compare severity, and perceive corruption changes across turns. Unlike current single-turn audio-language benchmarks, MRMAD evaluates whether LALMs can maintain consistent degradation hypotheses with new evidence and explain low-level acoustic phenomena in natural language. Through a systematic evaluation of 18 representative LALMs from non-thinking to reasoning and Omni models, we find that current models often recognize coarse content while failing to diagnose, compare, or reason about degradations reliably. MRMAD reveals an important yet overlooked aspect of audio-language understanding and provides a diagnostic foundation for building future LALMs that are robust to real-world acoustic conditions.
Abstract:Large audio-language models (LALMs) have shown promising progress in understanding speech, music, and general sound events, yet their ability to reason about how audio signals are degraded remains underexplored. Existing benchmarks primarily evaluate semantic understanding, event recognition, or high-level audio reasoning, leaving a basic question unanswered: Do LALMs understand the differences in audio quality? We introduce MRMAD, a Multi-Round Multi-Audio Degradation benchmark for evaluating audio degradation perception and understanding in LALMs. MRMAD spans speech, music, and sound, and frames evaluation as multi-turn dialogues over multiple audio inputs, requiring models to identify degradation types, compare severity, and perceive corruption changes across turns. Unlike current single-turn audio-language benchmarks, MRMAD evaluates whether LALMs can maintain consistent degradation hypotheses with new evidence and explain low-level acoustic phenomena in natural language. Through a systematic evaluation of 18 representative LALMs from non-thinking to reasoning and Omni models, we find that current models often recognize coarse content while failing to diagnose, compare, or reason about degradations reliably. MRMAD reveals an important yet overlooked aspect of audio-language understanding and provides a diagnostic foundation for building future LALMs that are robust to real-world acoustic conditions.
Sound (cs.SD); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS)
arXiv:2608.22236 [cs.SD]
(or arXiv:2608.22236v1 [cs.SD] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.22236 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 287 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Introducing the FFASR Leaderboard: Benchmarking ASR in the Real World
Hugging Face · 24 iun. 2026
The Open ASR Leaderboard Adds Its First Global South Language
Hugging Face · 28 aug. 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · 7 iun. 2026
.png&w=320)
How Together AI built the world’s fastest speech-to-text stack
Together AI · 29 mai 2026