analiza aiqbench
This economic-theory paper models how an LLM platform should split its offering between ad-supported and paid tiers, and how response quality, ad load, and prices interact. Its main points are that ads can fund useful service for users who would otherwise get none, that a moderate ad cap may maximize consumer surplus, and that cheaper compute can paradoxically increase ad revenue. These are modeled results from a monopoly setup, not empirical findings, so readers should treat the conclusions as conditional on its assumptions.
Monetizing Intelligence: Advertising and Subscription Design on LLM Platforms
arXiv:2610.32945v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) platforms introducing advertising must decide how much capability ad revenue should fund and what consumers should pay to avoid ads. We study a monopolistic platform that jointly chooses costly response quality, advertising intensity, and subscription prices when advertising reduces user value but better service raises advertising returns. Three findings follow. First, when partly ad-supported and ad-free plans coexist, advertising can finance useful service for consumers who receive none under pure subscription. Lower effective quality in middle plans weakens the alternatives available to premium users, allowing higher prices for unchanged ad-free service. Some fully ad-supported users gain utility, while partly ad-supported and ad-free users lose: broader access can coexist with utility polarization. Second, an intermediate advertising cap can maximize consumer surplus by preserving some revenue that finances service while limiting degradation. Third, cheaper compute can raise quality and reduce ad intensity, yet sufficiently large cost reductions can increase aggregate advertising revenue above its initial level because better service raises the value of the remaining advertised interactions. An extension shows how advertising-funded upgrades can bring plans to the same maximum capability and advertising exposure, eliminating the basis for different prices. These results make menu design central to evaluating LLM advertising: the consequences extend beyond users who see ads to the alternatives and prices faced by those who do not.
Abstract:Large language model (LLM) platforms introducing advertising must decide how much capability ad revenue should fund and what consumers should pay to avoid ads. We study a monopolistic platform that jointly chooses costly response quality, advertising intensity, and subscription prices when advertising reduces user value but better service raises advertising returns. Three findings follow. First, when partly ad-supported and ad-free plans coexist, advertising can finance useful service for consumers who receive none under pure subscription. Lower effective quality in middle plans weakens the alternatives available to premium users, allowing higher prices for unchanged ad-free service. Some fully ad-supported users gain utility, while partly ad-supported and ad-free users lose: broader access can coexist with utility polarization. Second, an intermediate advertising cap can maximize consumer surplus by preserving some revenue that finances service while limiting degradation. Third, cheaper compute can raise quality and reduce ad intensity, yet sufficiently large cost reductions can increase aggregate advertising revenue above its initial level because better service raises the value of the remaining advertised interactions. An extension shows how advertising-funded upgrades can bring plans to the same maximum capability and advertising exposure, eliminating the basis for different prices. These results make menu design central to evaluating LLM advertising: the consequences extend beyond users who see ads to the alternatives and prices faced by those who do not.
Theoretical Economics (econ.TH); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.32945 [econ.TH]
(or arXiv:2610.32945v1 [econ.TH] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.32945 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 318 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Introducing Apple Home Collection, a new lineup of smart home accessories
Apple Newsroom · 13 oct. 2026

Beyond the patch: Protecting your NetScaler gateway against future vulnerabilities
Cloudflare Blog · 19 oct. 2026

Meet Apple HomeView, a new way to enjoy entertainment and manage the home
Apple Newsroom · 13 oct. 2026

Apple unveils the new Apple TV 4K, supercharged by Siri AI
Apple Newsroom · 13 oct. 2026