analiza aiqbench
This paper addresses a critical gap in legal AI by proposing a component-level versioning pattern grounded in the LRMoo ontology to enable deterministic, point-in-time reconstruction of evolving legal norms. By formalizing legislative amendments as an event-centric chain of distinct works and expressions, the approach provides a verifiable semantic backbone essential for trustworthy legal knowledge graphs. The study validates this architecture using the Brazilian Constitution, offering a structured foundation for reliable automated processing of diachronic legal data.
Modeling the Diachronic Evolution of Legal Norms: An LRMoo-Based, Component-Level, Event-Centric Approach to Legal Knowledge Graphs
arXiv:2506.07853v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Representing the temporal evolution of legal norms is a critical challenge for automated processing. While foundational frameworks exist, they lack a formal pattern for granular, component-level versioning, hindering the deterministic point-in-time reconstruction of legal texts required by reliable AI applications. This paper proposes a structured, temporal modeling pattern grounded in the LRMoo ontology. Our approach models a norm's evolution as a diachronic chain of versioned F1 Works, distinguishing between language-agnostic Temporal Versions (TV), each being a distinct Work, and their monolingual Language Versions (LV), modeled as F2 Expressions. The legislative amendment process is formalized through event-centric modeling, allowing changes to be traced precisely. Using the Brazilian Constitution as a case study, we demonstrate that our architecture enables the exact reconstruction of any part of a legal text as it existed on a specific date. This provides a verifiable semantic backbone for legal knowledge graphs, offering a deterministic foundation for trustworthy legal AI.
Abstract:Representing the temporal evolution of legal norms is a critical challenge for automated processing. While foundational frameworks exist, they lack a formal pattern for granular, component-level versioning, hindering the deterministic point-in-time reconstruction of legal texts required by reliable AI applications. This paper proposes a structured, temporal modeling pattern grounded in the LRMoo ontology. Our approach models a norm's evolution as a diachronic chain of versioned F1 Works, distinguishing between language-agnostic Temporal Versions (TV), each being a distinct Work, and their monolingual Language Versions (LV), modeled as F2 Expressions. The legislative amendment process is formalized through event-centric modeling, allowing changes to be traced precisely. Using the Brazilian Constitution as a case study, we demonstrate that our architecture enables the exact reconstruction of any part of a legal text as it existed on a specific date. This provides a verifiable semantic backbone for legal knowledge graphs, offering a deterministic foundation for trustworthy legal AI.
Revised version. Refined ontological modeling of legislative events (adopted F27/E64 joint typing over E11). Introduced technical distinctions for bitemporal modeling in legal knowledge graphs and enriched the critical analysis of related standards in Section 2
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)
arXiv:2506.07853 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2506.07853v5 [cs.AI] for this version)
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 201 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Deconfusing Corrigibility
AI Alignment Forum · 17 oct. 2026

Arvind Gupta : India Rise as a Digital Power • Stimson Center
stimson.org · 1 aug. 2026

Hint-based CoT faithfulness evals still mostly work on Claude
LessWrong · 30 iul. 2026
A Red Line and Oversight Framework for Government AI Contracts
AI Alignment Forum · 18 iul. 2026