analiza aiqbench
This research addresses a critical gap in clinical AI reliability by proposing a missingness-aware calibration method for mortality prediction across hospitals with varying data recording rates. By applying group-specific Mondrian calibration, the approach mitigates coverage gaps that arise when standard pooled methods fail to account for distribution shifts defined by missing data patterns. The study highlights that while this technique improves worst-group performance in many settings, its efficacy depends heavily on whether hospital-level errors cancel out or reinforce each other under different weighting schemes.
Missingness-Aware Conformal Prediction Under Cross-Hospital Distribution Shift
arXiv:2609.30781v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Clinical measurements are recorded for some patients but not others, at rates that differ across hospitals, and marginal conformal coverage does not ensure coverage within groups defined by missingness. We propose a missingness-aware conformal calibration procedure for mortality prediction under cross-hospital distribution shift. It selects a measurement on an independent sample, groups patients by whether that measurement is recorded, and applies Mondrian calibration within each group, so no calibration outcome is reused. We evaluate the procedure across hospitals in eICU and across care units within one MIMIC-IV hospital, using three predictors. Relative to pooled calibration, it reduces the average worst-group coverage gap on its selected groups in all six settings, with a median reduction of 1.9 percentage points; paired site-bootstrap intervals exclude zero in five. These gains do not extend uniformly. Calibration by predicted risk achieves smaller gaps on a broader panel of missingness groups, and when eICU hospitals are evaluated separately, the gain shrinks for all three predictors and reverses in sign for one. We explain this discrepancy with a hospital-level decomposition. Pooling reweights hospitals through a covariance between group shares and coverage errors, and lets errors of opposite sign cancel: weighting explains the reversal, and cancellation accounts for most of the attenuation for the other two predictors. Constructed population distributions show that pooled and within-hospital evaluations can rank calibration methods oppositely even without sampling noise. Pooled improvement alone therefore cannot establish better coverage within hospitals, even when the calibration groups are fixed.
Abstract:Clinical measurements are recorded for some patients but not others, at rates that differ across hospitals, and marginal conformal coverage does not ensure coverage within groups defined by missingness. We propose a missingness-aware conformal calibration procedure for mortality prediction under cross-hospital distribution shift. It selects a measurement on an independent sample, groups patients by whether that measurement is recorded, and applies Mondrian calibration within each group, so no calibration outcome is reused. We evaluate the procedure across hospitals in eICU and across care units within one MIMIC-IV hospital, using three predictors. Relative to pooled calibration, it reduces the average worst-group coverage gap on its selected groups in all six settings, with a median reduction of 1.9 percentage points; paired site-bootstrap intervals exclude zero in five. These gains do not extend uniformly. Calibration by predicted risk achieves smaller gaps on a broader panel of missingness groups, and when eICU hospitals are evaluated separately, the gain shrinks for all three predictors and reverses in sign for one. We explain this discrepancy with a hospital-level decomposition. Pooling reweights hospitals through a covariance between group shares and coverage errors, and lets errors of opposite sign cancel: weighting explains the reversal, and cancellation accounts for most of the attenuation for the other two predictors. Constructed population distributions show that pooled and within-hospital evaluations can rank calibration methods oppositely even without sampling noise. Pooled improvement alone therefore cannot establish better coverage within hospitals, even when the calibration groups are fixed.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Applications (stat.AP)
arXiv:2609.30781 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.30781v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30781 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 340 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Threshold-Aware Conformal Routing
arXiv · 5 oct. 2026
SCP-NL2TL: Selective Conformal Prediction with Semantic Verification for Natural Language to Temporal Logic Specifications
arXiv · 7 aug. 2026
SMI: Ontology-Grounded Semantic IDs for Hierarchy-Aware Medical Concept Representation
arXiv · 15 oct. 2026
Generalized Conformal Predictive Systems Under Distributional Shifts
arXiv · 10 iun. 2026