analiza aiqbench
This study investigates the geometric origins of "grokking," proposing that delayed generalization in transformers stems from misalignment between low-loss regions rather than modular arithmetic alone. By demonstrating a stable anti-grokking case under symmetry-preserving splits, the authors challenge existing correlational theories and suggest that aligning these regions can collapse dynamics into purely trainable or non-trainable behaviors.
Misalignment of Low-Loss Regions Causes Grokking
arXiv:2610.00620v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Grokking refers to the delayed emergence of validation-set generalization after a model has already overfit the training set. Although first observed in small algorithmic tasks trained with transformers, its underlying mechanism remains unsettled. In this work, we develop an analysis framework based on mode connectivity and the geometry of low-loss regions. The framework predicts that the standard modular-arithmetic setting does not always produce grokking: under a symmetry-preserving train/validation split, we observe a stable anti-grokking case in which validation performance does not recover. This counterexample challenges several existing correlational explanations of grokking. More broadly, our analysis framework and results further suggest that grokking arises when the low-loss regions induced by the training and validation partitions are misaligned. Once these regions become well aligned, training hyperparameters alone cannot produce grokking and the observed dynamics collapse to either trainable or non-trainable behavior.
Abstract:Grokking refers to the delayed emergence of validation-set generalization after a model has already overfit the training set. Although first observed in small algorithmic tasks trained with transformers, its underlying mechanism remains unsettled. In this work, we develop an analysis framework based on mode connectivity and the geometry of low-loss regions. The framework predicts that the standard modular-arithmetic setting does not always produce grokking: under a symmetry-preserving train/validation split, we observe a stable anti-grokking case in which validation performance does not recover. This counterexample challenges several existing correlational explanations of grokking. More broadly, our analysis framework and results further suggest that grokking arises when the low-loss regions induced by the training and validation partitions are misaligned. Once these regions become well aligned, training hyperparameters alone cannot produce grokking and the observed dynamics collapse to either trainable or non-trainable behavior.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.00620 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.00620v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.00620 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 236 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Problems of Proliferation
LessWrong · 29 sept. 2026

The Alignment Problem: Computer Science Meets Analytic Philosophy
LessWrong · 18 oct. 2026
1 Layer Induction Heads and Some Research
LessWrong · 16 iun. 2026
Geometry-Aware Fisheye-LiDAR Fusion for Robust 3D Object Detection in Low-Overlap Setups
arXiv · 9 iun. 2026