Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This research introduces a novel Branch and Bound strategy that optimizes neural network verification by simultaneously splitting activation functions to efficiently locate verdict boundaries. By leveraging path monotonicity and quantitative estimation, the method reduces computational overhead associated with sequential bounds propagation in formal verification workflows. These advances directly enhance the scalability of rigorous safety guarantees for deployed AI models without relying on heuristic approximations.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Mining Verdict Boundaries for Neural Network Verification

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2607.28954v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Branch and Bound (BaB) aims to achieve complete verification of neural networks by adaptively partitioning the problem and applying off-the-shelf verifiers to subproblems. Its problem-splitting history can be represented as a tree, where each subproblem corresponds to a child node. A key problem of BaB lies in searching for the verdict boundaries across all the paths that divide the verified and unverified subproblems. We observe that the existing BaB approach tackles this problem by solving each expensive subproblem sequentially along the tree path as its depth increases, requiring costly bounds propagation at every visited BaB tree node (i.e., subproblem), which is inefficient. To address this issue, we propose effective search approaches that leverage the monotonicity of each path to efficiently and precisely locate the verdict boundary by simultaneously splitting multiple activation functions (e.g., ReLU), rather than processing them one at a time as in the classical approach. Our approach performs an effective exponential search along each path, allowing us to skip many boundary-unrelated subproblems when identifying the verdict boundary. The enhanced version further improves this process by estimating the boundary's position using quantitative information obtained from subproblem solving. We perform experimental evaluation on commonly-used benchmarks to assess our proposed techniques, and compare them with recent BaB-based approaches.

Abstract:Branch and Bound (BaB) aims to achieve complete verification of neural networks by adaptively partitioning the problem and applying off-the-shelf verifiers to subproblems. Its problem-splitting history can be represented as a tree, where each subproblem corresponds to a child node. A key problem of BaB lies in searching for the verdict boundaries across all the paths that divide the verified and unverified subproblems. We observe that the existing BaB approach tackles this problem by solving each expensive subproblem sequentially along the tree path as its depth increases, requiring costly bounds propagation at every visited BaB tree node (i.e., subproblem), which is inefficient. To address this issue, we propose effective search approaches that leverage the monotonicity of each path to efficiently and precisely locate the verdict boundary by simultaneously splitting multiple activation functions (e.g., ReLU), rather than processing them one at a time as in the classical approach. Our approach performs an effective exponential search along each path, allowing us to skip many boundary-unrelated subproblems when identifying the verdict boundary. The enhanced version further improves this process by estimating the boundary's position using quantitative information obtained from subproblem solving. We perform experimental evaluation on commonly-used benchmarks to assess our proposed techniques, and compare them with recent BaB-based approaches.

21 pages, 6 figures, 5 tables. Published in the proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Formal Methods (FM 2026)

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Software Engineering (cs.SE)

arXiv:2607.28954 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2607.28954v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.28954 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

In: Sampaio, A., Stoelinga, M. (eds.), Formal Methods, FM 2026, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 16556, pp. 67-88, Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2026

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-26204-2_4 DOI(s) linking to related resources

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 283 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe