analiza aiqbench
This arXiv preprint proposes a test-time method for getting generative models to produce more diverse outputs: it mines a categorical schema from a corpus of real artifacts, samples attribute configurations from the corpus statistics, and uses the generative model only as a renderer. The approach is evaluated across several tasks, including weather reports, webpages, and text-to-image generation, with claimed gains in distributional alignment and diversity. Readers should note that it is a single unreviewed preprint, and the gains depend on the quality of the mined schema and the availability of a representative corpus.
Mine, Sample, Render: Test-Time Diversity Alignment Of Generative Models
arXiv:2610.21185v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern generative models produce high-quality individual outputs but struggle to sample diversely, even when explicitly instructed to do so. We introduce MINE-SAMPLE-RENDER (MSR), a test-time approach that externalizes the diversity into an explicit, corpus-derived sampling procedure. Our pipeline (i) mines an interpretable categorical schema from a corpus of real artifacts and supplies statistics for sampling; (ii) samples attribute configurations from the corpus-derived statistics; (iii) uses a generative model purely as a conditional renderer of a sampled configuration. Across weather report generation, user simulation, webpage design, text-to-image generation, and agent-generated 3D assets, we evaluate the diversity and output quality of MSR-guided generation and show that MSR improves alignment with corpus distributions and diversity of generated outputs.
Abstract:Modern generative models produce high-quality individual outputs but struggle to sample diversely, even when explicitly instructed to do so. We introduce MINE-SAMPLE-RENDER (MSR), a test-time approach that externalizes the diversity into an explicit, corpus-derived sampling procedure. Our pipeline (i) mines an interpretable categorical schema from a corpus of real artifacts and supplies statistics for sampling; (ii) samples attribute configurations from the corpus-derived statistics; (iii) uses a generative model purely as a conditional renderer of a sampled configuration. Across weather report generation, user simulation, webpage design, text-to-image generation, and agent-generated 3D assets, we evaluate the diversity and output quality of MSR-guided generation and show that MSR improves alignment with corpus distributions and diversity of generated outputs.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.21185 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.21185v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.21185 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 212 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · 3 aug. 2026
Building and evaluating model diffing agents
AI Alignment Forum · 12 iun. 2026

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · 12 oct. 2026
Training a coding model to paint watercolours with TRL and OpenEnv
Hugging Face · 3 sept. 2026