analiza aiqbench
MetaNet introduces a task-conditioned controller that dynamically adjusts expert activation in Mixture-of-Experts models without retraining the backbone or router. By predicting layer-specific retention thresholds, it achieves significant reductions in average active experts while maintaining comparable accuracy on benchmarks like MMLU and C-Eval. This approach offers a viable path to optimizing inference costs for large-scale MoE deployments through adaptive sparsity rather than static configurations.
Meta-Learning Where to Allocate Experts: Task-Conditioned Layer-Wise Compression for MoEs
arXiv:2608.26650v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models route each token to a subset of expert networks, increasing capacity while keeping per-token computation sparse. In many deployed MoEs, the number of active experts is fixed across layers and tasks, although layer roles and expert redundancy vary with depth and demand varies with difficulty. Existing approaches address only part of this setting: layer-wise allocations are usually determined offline and reused for all tasks, while token-level methods vary expert activation using local routing signals without task-level context. We propose MetaNet, a support-set controller that predicts, for each layer, an expert-retention threshold and a bounded routing bias. The backbone, experts, and router remain frozen. On DeepSeek-MoE-16B-Chat, MetaNet provides a tunable accuracy-expert-activation trade-off. Relative to fixed k=6, a conservative setting activates 3.61 experts on average (40% fewer) and achieves comparable MMLU accuracy (0.489 vs. 0.474), whereas an aggressive setting activates 2.28 experts on average (62% fewer) with accuracy approximately 3.7 percentage points lower. The MMLU-trained controller also transfers to C-Eval without retraining, activating 2.90 experts on average (52% fewer than fixed k=6) at 0.386 accuracy.
Abstract:Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models route each token to a subset of expert networks, increasing capacity while keeping per-token computation sparse. In many deployed MoEs, the number of active experts is fixed across layers and tasks, although layer roles and expert redundancy vary with depth and demand varies with difficulty. Existing approaches address only part of this setting: layer-wise allocations are usually determined offline and reused for all tasks, while token-level methods vary expert activation using local routing signals without task-level context. We propose MetaNet, a support-set controller that predicts, for each layer, an expert-retention threshold and a bounded routing bias. The backbone, experts, and router remain frozen. On DeepSeek-MoE-16B-Chat, MetaNet provides a tunable accuracy-expert-activation trade-off. Relative to fixed k=6, a conservative setting activates 3.61 experts on average (40% fewer) and achieves comparable MMLU accuracy (0.489 vs. 0.474), whereas an aggressive setting activates 2.28 experts on average (62% fewer) with accuracy approximately 3.7 percentage points lower. The MMLU-trained controller also transfers to C-Eval without retraining, activating 2.90 experts on average (52% fewer than fixed k=6) at 0.386 accuracy.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2608.26650 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2608.26650v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.26650 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 271 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 3 oct. 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 10 sept. 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · 8 oct. 2026