analiza aiqbench
This study establishes that activation magnitudes in modern open LLMs vary by nearly four orders of magnitude across families and architectures, directly constraining low-bit quantization strategies. Key findings include MoE models exhibiting significantly lower activation peaks than dense counterparts and the residual stream consistently carrying global maxima, indicating that activation scale is a specific model property rather than a simple function of parameter count. These metrics are critical for engineering teams deploying efficient inference stacks, as they must measure and report maximum activations alongside model releases to ensure stable quantization.
Measuring Maximum Activations in Open Large Language Models
arXiv:2605.15572v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The dynamic range of activations is a first-order constraint for low-bit quantization, activation scaling, and stable LLM inference. Prior work characterized outlier features and massive activations on pre-2024 LLaMA-style models, and the downstream activation-quantization stack inherits that picture without revisiting it for the post-LLaMA open-model boom. We ask the deployment-oriented question: how large can activations get in modern open LLMs, and how does this magnitude vary across families, generations, and training stages? Under a unified pipeline (5,000-sample multi-domain corpus, family-specific tokenization, identical hooks across embeddings, hidden states, attention, MLP/MoE, SwiGLU gates, and final norm), we measure global and layerwise maxima on 27 checkpoints from 8 open families spanning dense, MoE, vision-language, intermediate-training, and instruction-tuned variants. We find that (i) global maxima span over nearly four orders of magnitude at comparable parameter counts, with Qwen3.5 and MoE checkpoints in the 10^2 to 10^3 range and Gemma3-27B-it reaching ~7 x 10^5; (ii) cross-family and cross-generation comparisons break simple monotonic scaling; and (iii) MoE checkpoints exhibit 14.0-23.4x lower peaks than matched-scale dense counterparts, while the residual stream carries the global maximum in 22/24 checkpoints. A lightweight INT-8 sanity check shows that measured maxima co-vary with low-bit reconstruction error via activation-scale selection. We conclude that maximum activation magnitude is a model property tied to family, architecture, and training stage - not a simple byproduct of size - and should be measured and reported alongside any open-weight release before low-bit deployment. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/clx1415926/Max_act_llm.
Abstract:The dynamic range of activations is a first-order constraint for low-bit quantization, activation scaling, and stable LLM inference. Prior work characterized outlier features and massive activations on pre-2024 LLaMA-style models, and the downstream activation-quantization stack inherits that picture without revisiting it for the post-LLaMA open-model boom. We ask the deployment-oriented question: how large can activations get in modern open LLMs, and how does this magnitude vary across families, generations, and training stages? Under a unified pipeline (5,000-sample multi-domain corpus, family-specific tokenization, identical hooks across embeddings, hidden states, attention, MLP/MoE, SwiGLU gates, and final norm), we measure global and layerwise maxima on 27 checkpoints from 8 open families spanning dense, MoE, vision-language, intermediate-training, and instruction-tuned variants. We find that (i) global maxima span over nearly four orders of magnitude at comparable parameter counts, with Qwen3.5 and MoE checkpoints in the 10^2 to 10^3 range and Gemma3-27B-it reaching ~7 x 10^5; (ii) cross-family and cross-generation comparisons break simple monotonic scaling; and (iii) MoE checkpoints exhibit 14.0-23.4x lower peaks than matched-scale dense counterparts, while the residual stream carries the global maximum in 22/24 checkpoints. A lightweight INT-8 sanity check shows that measured maxima co-vary with low-bit reconstruction error via activation-scale selection. We conclude that maximum activation magnitude is a model property tied to family, architecture, and training stage - not a simple byproduct of size - and should be measured and reported alongside any open-weight release before low-bit deployment. The code is publicly available at this https URL.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2605.15572 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2605.15572v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 257 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Physics-residual machine learning predicts oxygen-evolution catalyst activity beyond the training range from sparse polarization measurements
arXiv · 22 sept. 2026
Preservability of Measurement Incompatibility: Purification, Activation, and a No-Go Theorem
arXiv · 2 oct. 2026
Learning Graph Beliefs for Active Radio Mapping With Decision-Certified Multi-Step Sensing
arXiv · 30 oct. 2026

Filtering Strengthens Quantum Incompatibility Preservation but Cannot Activate It
Quantum Zeitgeist · 4 oct. 2026