analiza aiqbench
This research addresses the computational bottleneck of determining quantum measurement incompatibility by replacing exponential semidefinite programs with a polynomial-time hierarchy of linear programs. The method offers a practical solution for analyzing large sets of qubit measurements on standard hardware while providing non-trivial bounds for higher-dimensional systems like qutrits. For researchers in quantum information, this approach significantly expands the feasible scale of steering and robustness analysis previously limited by computational complexity.
Measurement incompatibility and quantum steering via linear programming
arXiv:2506.03045v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The problem of deciding whether a set of quantum measurements is jointly measurable is known to be equivalent to determining whether a quantum assemblage is unsteerable. This problem can be formulated as a semidefinite program (SDP). However, the number of variables and constraints in such a formulation grows exponentially with the number of measurements, rendering it intractable for large measurement sets. In this work, we circumvent this problem by transforming the SDP into a hierarchy of linear programs that compute upper and lower bounds on the incompatibility robustness with a complexity that grows polynomially in the number of measurements. The hierarchy is guaranteed to converge and it can be applied to arbitrary measurements -- including non-projective POVMs (Positive Operator-Valued Measures) -- in arbitrary dimensions. While convergence becomes impractical in high dimensions, in the case of qubits our method reliably provides accurate upper and lower bounds for the incompatibility robustness of sets with several hundred measurements in a short time using a standard laptop. We also apply our methods to qutrits, obtaining non-trivial upper and lower bounds in scenarios that are otherwise intractable using the standard SDP approach, although such bounds are significantly looser than the ones obtained in the qubit case. Finally, we show how our methods can be used to construct local hidden state models for states (i.e., to prove that a state cannot lead to steering under any possible local measurements), or conversely, to certify that a given state exhibits steering; for two-qubit quantum states, our approach is comparable to, and in some cases outperforms, the current best methods.
Abstract:The problem of deciding whether a set of quantum measurements is jointly measurable is known to be equivalent to determining whether a quantum assemblage is unsteerable. This problem can be formulated as a semidefinite program (SDP). However, the number of variables and constraints in such a formulation grows exponentially with the number of measurements, rendering it intractable for large measurement sets. In this work, we circumvent this problem by transforming the SDP into a hierarchy of linear programs that compute upper and lower bounds on the incompatibility robustness with a complexity that grows polynomially in the number of measurements. The hierarchy is guaranteed to converge and it can be applied to arbitrary measurements -- including non-projective POVMs (Positive Operator-Valued Measures) -- in arbitrary dimensions. While convergence becomes impractical in high dimensions, in the case of qubits our method reliably provides accurate upper and lower bounds for the incompatibility robustness of sets with several hundred measurements in a short time using a standard laptop. We also apply our methods to qutrits, obtaining non-trivial upper and lower bounds in scenarios that are otherwise intractable using the standard SDP approach, although such bounds are significantly looser than the ones obtained in the qubit case. Finally, we show how our methods can be used to construct local hidden state models for states (i.e., to prove that a state cannot lead to steering under any possible local measurements), or conversely, to certify that a given state exhibits steering; for two-qubit quantum states, our approach is comparable to, and in some cases outperforms, the current best methods.
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
arXiv:2506.03045 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2506.03045v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.03045 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 357 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Quantifiers and witnesses for the nonclassicality of measurements and of states
Quantum Journal · 30 iul. 2026
Measurement incompatibility and quantum steering via linear programming
arXiv · 11 iun. 2026

Strict hierarchy between $n$-wise measurement simulability, compatibility structures, and multi-copy compatibility
Quantum Journal · 8 oct. 2026
All star-incompatible measurements can certify steering-based randomness
arXiv · 1 oct. 2026