În afara temei aiqbench
Această știre a fost preluată de la o sursă pe care o urmărim, dar nu ține de domeniul AI sau cuantic, așa că nu există o perspectivă aiqbench pentru ea.
Measure by measure, studying society accurately

Naoki Egami has become a standout in political methodology, helping refine tools that give scholars durable results.
As it happens, Egami’s interests range widely. Years ago, before the current artificial intelligence craze, he started studying what happens when AI tools are introduced into studies. How accurate are they? How can researchers account for AI tendencies? Focusing on these and other questions has helped Egami build a broad portfolio of research, win awards, and flourish in his career. All the while, he retains interest in basic questions about politics, as well as measuring things correctly. “You need both perspectives,” Egami says. “If you only think about technical statistical theories, you might not work on interesting empirical problems sometimes. But if you only think about problems, you won’t really solve them optimally; you’ll…
Extras afișat conform termenilor RSS ai publicației · 114 cuvinte · textul integral și figurile sunt pe site-ul publicației
Subiecte conexe
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · 2 oct. 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · 25 iul. 2026
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · 13 oct. 2026