analiza aiqbench
MCPAgentBench addresses critical gaps in current evaluations by introducing a dynamic sandbox that tests LLM agents on authentic tasks with distractors, rather than relying on external services. This benchmark reveals significant performance disparities among state-of-the-art models when handling complex, multi-step tool invocations via the Model Context Protocol. The release provides essential metrics for assessing both task completion rates and execution efficiency in real-world agent scenarios.
MCPAgentBench: A Real-world Task Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Agent MCP Tool Use
arXiv:2512.24565v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly serving as autonomous agents, and their utilization of external tools via the Model Context Protocol (MCP) is considered a future trend. Current MCP evaluation sets suffer from issues such as reliance on external MCP services and a lack of difficulty awareness. To address these limitations, we propose MCPAgentBench, a benchmark based on real-world MCP definitions designed to evaluate the tool-use capabilities of agents. We construct a dataset containing authentic tasks and simulated MCP tools. The evaluation employs a dynamic sandbox environment that presents agents with candidate tool lists containing distractors, thereby testing their tool selection and discrimination abilities. Furthermore, we introduce comprehensive metrics to measure both task completion rates and execution efficiency. Experiments conducted on state-of-the-art LLMs reveal significant performance differences in handling complex, multi-step tool invocations. All code is open-source at https://github.com/Brunestuder/MCPAgentBench.
Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly serving as autonomous agents, and their utilization of external tools via the Model Context Protocol (MCP) is considered a future trend. Current MCP evaluation sets suffer from issues such as reliance on external MCP services and a lack of difficulty awareness. To address these limitations, we propose MCPAgentBench, a benchmark based on real-world MCP definitions designed to evaluate the tool-use capabilities of agents. We construct a dataset containing authentic tasks and simulated MCP tools. The evaluation employs a dynamic sandbox environment that presents agents with candidate tool lists containing distractors, thereby testing their tool selection and discrimination abilities. Furthermore, we introduce comprehensive metrics to measure both task completion rates and execution efficiency. Experiments conducted on state-of-the-art LLMs reveal significant performance differences in handling complex, multi-step tool invocations. All code is open-source at this https URL.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2512.24565 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2512.24565v4 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.24565 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 233 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · 3 aug. 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 3 oct. 2026

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · 17 sept. 2026
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · 2 oct. 2026