analiza aiqbench
This study introduces MCP-GRANITE, a benchmark evaluating how tool-interface granularity impacts the performance of locally deployed LLM agents in edge computing scenarios. The research demonstrates that a moderate level of abstraction (a 4-tool interface) significantly outperforms both fine-grained primitives and monolithic tools, while revealing that model size correlates more strongly with latency than task completion. These findings provide critical guidance for optimizing agent architectures under strict resource constraints without relying on scaling to massive models.
MCP-GRANITE Benchmark: GRANularity Interface TEsting for MCP-Based LLM Agents
arXiv:2609.24161v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As LLM agents increasingly interact with external tools through standardized protocols such as MCP, tool-interface design becomes a critical yet underexplored factor. How fun{\psi}tionality is decomposed into tools affects whether an agent can select the right tool and construct valid arguments. This choice is especially consequential at the edge, where resource constraints limit which models can run locally and scaling up is often not an option. We present MCP-GRANITE, an open-source extensible benchmark framework that treats tool-interface granularity as a controlled variable for MCP-based agents, evaluated under edge and IoT scenarios. It comprises 81 multi-step scenarios across 9 domains, instantiated at 4 granularity levels from fine-grained primitive tools to a single tool. We evaluate 9 locally deployed models (268M-20.9B parameters) across 8,748 trials using task completion, tool selection F1, argument accuracy, latency, and resource-usage metrics. Results show that a 4-tool interface offers the best trade-off, improving task completion by 16.4% over fine-grained primitives and 33.6% over a single monolithic tool, while nearly doubling argument accuracy. Model size is only weakly correlated with task completion and strongly with latency, while its association with argument accuracy is less robust, and a 3.2B model at the optimal granularity outperforms a 20.9B model at a mismatched one. These findings identify tool-interface granularity as a key design parameter for MCP-based agents.
Abstract:As LLM agents increasingly interact with external tools through standardized protocols such as MCP, tool-interface design becomes a critical yet underexplored factor. How fun{\psi}tionality is decomposed into tools affects whether an agent can select the right tool and construct valid arguments. This choice is especially consequential at the edge, where resource constraints limit which models can run locally and scaling up is often not an option. We present MCP-GRANITE, an open-source extensible benchmark framework that treats tool-interface granularity as a controlled variable for MCP-based agents, evaluated under edge and IoT scenarios. It comprises 81 multi-step scenarios across 9 domains, instantiated at 4 granularity levels from fine-grained primitive tools to a single tool. We evaluate 9 locally deployed models (268M-20.9B parameters) across 8,748 trials using task completion, tool selection F1, argument accuracy, latency, and resource-usage metrics. Results show that a 4-tool interface offers the best trade-off, improving task completion by 16.4% over fine-grained primitives and 33.6% over a single monolithic tool, while nearly doubling argument accuracy. Model size is only weakly correlated with task completion and strongly with latency, while its association with argument accuracy is less robust, and a 3.2B model at the optimal granularity outperforms a 20.9B model at a mismatched one. These findings identify tool-interface granularity as a key design parameter for MCP-based agents.
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.24161 [cs.DC]
(or arXiv:2609.24161v1 [cs.DC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.24161 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 319 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · 6 aug. 2026

Granite 4.2 LLMs: How They're Built
Hugging Face · 25 aug. 2026

What We Learned Trying to Catch AI Liars: An Aletheia's Quest Retrospective
EleutherAI · 25 aug. 2026

What Is an LLM Gateway? The Missing Layer Between Your App and AI Models
OpenRouter · 11 iun. 2026