analiza aiqbench
The MAWARITH dataset and benchmark address a critical gap in AI capabilities by enabling large language models to perform complex, multi-step reasoning within the specific domain of Islamic inheritance law. By providing annotated Arabic cases with step-by-step justifications grounded in classical juristic sources, this resource allows researchers to train models that accurately identify heirs, apply blocking rules, and compute precise share allocations without relying on simplified multiple-choice formats. This advancement is significant for developing specialized AI tools capable of handling high-stakes legal reasoning where error propagation must be minimized through rigorous evaluation metrics like MIR-E.
MAWARITH: A Dataset and Benchmark for Legal Inheritance Reasoning with LLMs
arXiv:2603.07539v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Islamic inheritance law is challenging for large language models because solving inheritance cases requires complex, structured, multi-step reasoning and the correct application of juristic rules to compute heirs' shares. We introduce \textit{MAWARITH}, a large-scale annotated dataset of 12,500 Arabic inheritance cases for training and evaluating models on the full reasoning chain: (i) identifying eligible heirs, (ii) applying blocking (\textit{\d{h}ajb}) and allocation rules, and (iii) computing exact inheritance shares. To the best of our knowledge, \textit{MAWARITH} is the first Arabic corpus and benchmark designed for end-to-end Islamic inheritance reasoning. Unlike prior datasets that restrict inheritance case solving to multiple-choice questions, \textit{MAWARITH} supports the full reasoning chain and provides step-by-step solutions with justifications grounded in classical juristic sources and established inheritance rules, as well as exact share calculations. This enables models to learn how to generate detailed, step-by-step responses to user queries that reflect real-world Islamic inheritance cases. To evaluate models beyond final-answer accuracy, we propose \textit{MIR-E} (Mawarith Inheritance Reasoning Evaluation), a weighted multi-stage metric that scores key reasoning stages and captures error propagation across the pipeline. We evaluate six large language models in a zero-shot setting. A commercial model achieves about 90\%, whereas all evaluated open-source models remain below 50\%. Our error analysis identifies recurring failure patterns, including scenario misinterpretation, errors in heir identification, errors in share allocation, and missing or incorrect application of key inheritance rules such as \textit{\textquotesingle awl} and \textit{radd}. The \textit{MAWARITH} dataset is publicly available at https://gitlab.com/nlpresearcher/mawarith.
Abstract:Islamic inheritance law is challenging for large language models because solving inheritance cases requires complex, structured, multi-step reasoning and the correct application of juristic rules to compute heirs' shares. We introduce \textit{MAWARITH}, a large-scale annotated dataset of 12,500 Arabic inheritance cases for training and evaluating models on the full reasoning chain: (i) identifying eligible heirs, (ii) applying blocking (\textit{\d{h}ajb}) and allocation rules, and (iii) computing exact inheritance shares. To the best of our knowledge, \textit{MAWARITH} is the first Arabic corpus and benchmark designed for end-to-end Islamic inheritance reasoning. Unlike prior datasets that restrict inheritance case solving to multiple-choice questions, \textit{MAWARITH} supports the full reasoning chain and provides step-by-step solutions with justifications grounded in classical juristic sources and established inheritance rules, as well as exact share calculations. This enables models to learn how to generate detailed, step-by-step responses to user queries that reflect real-world Islamic inheritance cases. To evaluate models beyond final-answer accuracy, we propose \textit{MIR-E} (Mawarith Inheritance Reasoning Evaluation), a weighted multi-stage metric that scores key reasoning stages and captures error propagation across the pipeline. We evaluate six large language models in a zero-shot setting. A commercial model achieves about 90\%, whereas all evaluated open-source models remain below 50\%. Our error analysis identifies recurring failure patterns, including scenario misinterpretation, errors in heir identification, errors in share allocation, and missing or incorrect application of key inheritance rules such as \textit{\textquotesingle awl} and \textit{radd}. The \textit{MAWARITH} dataset is publicly available at this https URL.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2603.07539 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2603.07539v3 [cs.CL] for this version)
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 254 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
QIAS 2026: Overview of the Shared Task on Islamic Inheritance Reasoning
arXiv · 15 iun. 2026
How Do LLMs Understand Legal Philosophy? Diagnosing Legal-Philosophical Reasoning in LLMs
arXiv · 15 oct. 2026

The basic argument for making AI better at moral philosophy
LessWrong · 14 oct. 2026
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · 2 oct. 2026