analiza aiqbench
This research demonstrates that governing enterprise analytics with deterministic policies can achieve perfect reproducibility and evidence-based results, outperforming fully autonomous runtime planning agents in controlled settings. The study highlights a viable architectural shift where language models handle intent interpretation while pre-approved analytical programs execute queries, ensuring reliability within defined relational operation classes. This approach offers a practical pathway for deploying trustworthy AI in high-stakes business analytics without sacrificing expressive power.
MasterControl Seventeen Every Time
arXiv:2609.03209v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study a governed approach to enterprise analytics: a language model interprets the question, while deterministic policy selects and runs a pre-approved analytical program that returns both results and evidence. We show that this restriction can remain expressive within a defined analytical class, using relational operations plus aggregation, comparison, windows, ranking, and similarity. Fixed meaning, policy, data, and execution rules also make results replayable. Across 440 runs, three 8B models generated SQL and selected tools at runtime, while Qwen3-8B interpreted intent only and policy executed the approved program. None of 330 runtime-planning episodes matched the full answer-and-evidence contract across all test datasets; the policy-executed analyzer matched 110 of 110. This is a configuration-specific result, not evidence that runtime agents cannot succeed under other designs.
Abstract:We study a governed approach to enterprise analytics: a language model interprets the question, while deterministic policy selects and runs a pre-approved analytical program that returns both results and evidence. We show that this restriction can remain expressive within a defined analytical class, using relational operations plus aggregation, comparison, windows, ranking, and similarity. Fixed meaning, policy, data, and execution rules also make results replayable. Across 440 runs, three 8B models generated SQL and selected tools at runtime, while Qwen3-8B interpreted intent only and policy executed the approved program. None of 330 runtime-planning episodes matched the full answer-and-evidence contract across all test datasets; the policy-executed analyzer matched 110 of 110. This is a configuration-specific result, not evidence that runtime agents cannot succeed under other designs.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.03209 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.03209v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.03209 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 218 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

How Photonic Chips Differ From Electronic Chips
Quantum Zeitgeist · 19 sept. 2026

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · 30 iul. 2026
How to build a cancer vaccine, and whether they will work this time
LessWrong · 8 iun. 2026

The Rise of the Forward Deployed Engineer — and How To Do the Job Right
Latent Space · 12 sept. 2026