analiza aiqbench
This research identifies a critical flaw in modular robotic systems where independently calibrated components fail to maintain uncertainty calibration once composed, leading to unsafe planning decisions. The study demonstrates that ignoring correlations between error sources can cause the system to be either dangerously overconfident or excessively conservative, directly impacting safety margins. To address this, the authors propose modeling joint covariance and developing interfaces that explicitly communicate dependence information to restore accurate system-level uncertainty estimates.
Marginal Calibration Does Not Compose: Hidden Dependence in Modular Robot Navigation
arXiv:2609.23731v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Robotic systems are typically composed of multiple independently developed modules that work together to perceive, predict, and act in the environment. Although each module may perform reliably in isolation, composing them does not necessarily preserve uncertainty calibration at the system level. In this work, we show that well-calibrated component interfaces do not necessarily produce calibrated downstream behavior after composition. Using a moving-obstacle prediction pipeline, we demonstrate that position and velocity estimators can each appear well calibrated individually, yet differences in how their error are correlated lead to substantially different estimates of future-state uncertainty. Consequently, assuming independence can make the system either overly confident or unnecessarily conservative, directly influencing downstream planning decisions and safety. Through simulations, we show that modeling the joint covariance restores downstream calibration and improves system performance, whereas dependence-robust uncertainty bounds enhance safety at the cost of increased conservatism. Our findings reveal a fundamental limitation of independently validating robotic modules and highlight the need for interfaces that communicate dependence information or support direct system-level calibration.
Abstract:Robotic systems are typically composed of multiple independently developed modules that work together to perceive, predict, and act in the environment. Although each module may perform reliably in isolation, composing them does not necessarily preserve uncertainty calibration at the system level. In this work, we show that well-calibrated component interfaces do not necessarily produce calibrated downstream behavior after composition. Using a moving-obstacle prediction pipeline, we demonstrate that position and velocity estimators can each appear well calibrated individually, yet differences in how their error are correlated lead to substantially different estimates of future-state uncertainty. Consequently, assuming independence can make the system either overly confident or unnecessarily conservative, directly influencing downstream planning decisions and safety. Through simulations, we show that modeling the joint covariance restores downstream calibration and improves system performance, whereas dependence-robust uncertainty bounds enhance safety at the cost of increased conservatism. Our findings reveal a fundamental limitation of independently validating robotic modules and highlight the need for interfaces that communicate dependence information or support direct system-level calibration.
Robotics (cs.RO); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.23731 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2609.23731v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.23731 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 263 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

The Machines that Make the Machines
NVIDIA · 7 oct. 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026
Class-Conditional Conformal Prediction for Signal Temporal Logic Inference with Many Classes
arXiv · 14 oct. 2026
Online Target-less Radar-LiDAR-Camera Extrinsic Calibration via Joint Optimization
arXiv · 6 oct. 2026