analiza aiqbench
This study provides a comprehensive mapping of over 350 U.S. undergraduate AI programs, revealing significant variability in curriculum structures between majors and minors as of early 2026. Key findings indicate that while general artificial intelligence courses are not universal, machine learning is consistently required for degrees lacking it, highlighting its foundational role in current education standards. The accompanying dynamic tool offers a vital resource for tracking the evolving landscape of AI instruction across American universities.
Mapping AI Programs in the U.S: A Status Report from Early 2026 and an Analysis of AI Majors and Minors
arXiv:2606.12428v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present a report on the status of undergraduate Artificial Intelligence (AI) programs in the United States in Spring 2026. In so doing, we 1) describe our scraping and mapping tools, which dynamically update to track the state of AI education in the U.S., and 2) create a historic record at a time of great upheaval. The tool we developed, available at https://cicmap.ai, detects, scrapes, and displays data from more than 350 undergraduate AI programs--majors, minors, concentrations, and certificates--at 4-year universities. Our tool searched over 560 institutions to locate these programs, a sample that represents 86\% of all undergraduate Computer Science (CS) graduates in the U.S. This tool allows prospective students, guidance counselors, administrators, and faculty to easily access AI program requirements and is designed to continually update as new programs emerge. To the best of our knowledge, this survey represents the most comprehensive snapshot of the state of AI programs in the U.S. to date. With this work we offer three important contributions: 1) a record of AI programs in the U.S. at a time of great upheaval; 2) a tool to explore AI programs and their requirements; and 3) an analysis of the courses required for 66 AI majors and 87 AI minors. Our analysis of majors and minors shows great variability in the size and the requirements of these degrees, but we note two takeaways. First, not all majors require a general AI course, but if they don't, they do require a Machine Learning (ML) course. Second, while more than a third of majors require an Ethics in AI course, just under a quarter of AI minors do.
Title:Mapping AI Programs in the U.S: A Status Report from Early 2026 and an Analysis of AI Majors and Minors
Abstract:We present a report on the status of undergraduate Artificial Intelligence (AI) programs in the United States in Spring 2026. In so doing, we 1) describe our scraping and mapping tools, which dynamically update to track the state of AI education in the U.S., and 2) create a historic record at a time of great upheaval. The tool we developed, available at this https URL, detects, scrapes, and displays data from more than 350 undergraduate AI programs--majors, minors, concentrations, and certificates--at 4-year universities. Our tool searched over 560 institutions to locate these programs, a sample that represents 86\% of all undergraduate Computer Science (CS) graduates in the U.S. This tool allows prospective students, guidance counselors, administrators, and faculty to easily access AI program requirements and is designed to continually update as new programs emerge. To the best of our knowledge, this survey represents the most comprehensive snapshot of the state of AI programs in the U.S. to date. With this work we offer three important contributions: 1) a record of AI programs in the U.S. at a time of great upheaval; 2) a tool to explore AI programs and their requirements; and 3) an analysis of the courses required for 66 AI majors and 87 AI minors. Our analysis of majors and minors shows great variability in the size and the requirements of these degrees, but we note two takeaways. First, not all majors require a general AI course, but if they don't, they do require a Machine Learning (ML) course. Second, while more than a third of majors require an Ethics in AI course, just under a quarter of AI minors do.
Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2606.12428 [cs.CY]
(or arXiv:2606.12428v1 [cs.CY] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.12428 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 389 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
StabQ: Quantum Program Analysis via Weighted Stabilizer Representations
arXiv · 26 aug. 2026

Beyond LLMs: Why Scalable Enterprise AI Adoption Depends on Agent Logic
Hugging Face · 1 iun. 2026

Quantum Programs Verified With New Runtime Analysis Framework
Quantum Zeitgeist · 15 iul. 2026

Haskell Program Verifies Hybrid Quantum Code Automatically
Quantum Zeitgeist · 15 iul. 2026