analiza aiqbench
This study rigorously proves a conjecture regarding the fundamental limits of online Frank-Wolfe methods, establishing that fixed-coefficient linear minimization strategies cannot surpass the $T^{3/4}$ regret rate on general convex sets. By extending these lower bounds to all deterministic learners in an oracle-only model, the work clarifies the theoretical ceiling for optimization algorithms relying on a constant number of gradient queries per round. These findings are critical for researchers aiming to design dimension-independent guarantees or explore adaptive schedules that might eventually break existing performance barriers.
Lower Bounds for Linear-Oracle Online Learning
arXiv:2609.38375v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Can a constant number of linear minimizations per round improve on the $T^{3/4}$ regret rate of online Frank-Wolfe on general convex sets? Weibel et al. conjectured that fixed-coefficient methods cannot. We prove their conjecture and extend the lower bound to every deterministic learner in an oracle-only model. The learner receives an initial feasible point and a diameter bound, and must remain feasible on every domain consistent with its oracle replies. For $T$ rounds, at most $b$ calls between decisions, diameter bound $D$, and gradient norm bound $L$, we construct an instance in dimension $d=2b(T-1)+1$ with regret at least $2^{-1/4}LDb^{-1/4}T^{3/4}$. The adversary fixes the domain, initial point, deterministic tie rule and linear losses before play. The vertices form a path on which every point available before a decision has zero current loss, while the final vertex has negative loss on every round. For constant $b$, the result matches the known upper rate for dimension-independent guarantees. For one-call fixed schedules with a nonzero coefficient on the newest gradient, a second construction gives regret at least $3LDT^{3/4}/4$ with unique minimizers at every issued query. Exact-arithmetic certificates for the tuned schedule of Weibel et al. closely match their finite-horizon numerical worst cases, with unique oracle replies.
Abstract:Can a constant number of linear minimizations per round improve on the $T^{3/4}$ regret rate of online Frank-Wolfe on general convex sets? Weibel et al. conjectured that fixed-coefficient methods cannot. We prove their conjecture and extend the lower bound to every deterministic learner in an oracle-only model. The learner receives an initial feasible point and a diameter bound, and must remain feasible on every domain consistent with its oracle replies. For $T$ rounds, at most $b$ calls between decisions, diameter bound $D$, and gradient norm bound $L$, we construct an instance in dimension $d=2b(T-1)+1$ with regret at least $2^{-1/4}LDb^{-1/4}T^{3/4}$. The adversary fixes the domain, initial point, deterministic tie rule and linear losses before play. The vertices form a path on which every point available before a decision has zero current loss, while the final vertex has negative loss on every round. For constant $b$, the result matches the known upper rate for dimension-independent guarantees. For one-call fixed schedules with a nonzero coefficient on the newest gradient, a second construction gives regret at least $3LDT^{3/4}/4$ with unique minimizers at every issued query. Exact-arithmetic certificates for the tuned schedule of Weibel et al. closely match their finite-horizon numerical worst cases, with unique oracle replies.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
arXiv:2609.38375 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2609.38375v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.38375 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 301 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Tight Regret Bound for Online Inverse Linear Optimization via Multiscale Matrix Weights
arXiv · 24 sept. 2026
Sharp Oracle-Regret Tradeoffs for Projection-Free Online Convex Optimization
arXiv · 2 oct. 2026
Dimension-Optimal Dynamic Regret in Exp-Concave Online Learning
arXiv · 15 oct. 2026
From Non-Convex to Strongly Convex: Curvature-Adaptive FTPL for Online Optimization
arXiv · 3 iun. 2026