Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCercetare AI

analiza aiqbench

This study exposes a critical gap in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems, revealing that performance degrades significantly when models handle multi-turn conversations rather than single queries. The research identifies two specific failure modes—where conversational rephrasing distorts retrieval or where synthesis fails across turns—that collectively reduce accuracy by up to 21% and increase unreliability by 47%. For developers building robust AI assistants, these findings underscore the urgent need to address context retention and query stability beyond standard single-turn benchmarks.
Surse care acoperăarXiv, AWS
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Lost in Conversation or Lost in Translation? Diagnosing Multi-Turn Degradation in RAG

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2609.36700v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When conversing with large language models (LLMs), users often begin with a simple question and build towards a multi-hop question through follow-up turns. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and its graph-based variant (GraphRAG) have become the dominant approaches for grounding LLM responses in external evidence, yet both are evaluated almost exclusively on single-turn, fully specified queries. We systematically investigate this evaluation mismatch through a large-scale simulation study. Building on prior work on multi-turn LLM evaluation, we transform questions from multi-hop question answering (QA) benchmarks into underspecified conversations and evaluate ten LLM assistants with eight retrieval systems across 1.5 million simulated conversations. Our findings reveal that multi-turn interaction causes widespread performance degradation, incurring relative performance drops of up to 21% and increasing unreliability by 47%, making RAG systems simultaneously less accurate and less reliable. We identify two distinct failure modes behind this degradation. Systems are either lost in translation, where conversational rephrasing distorts the retrieval query, or lost in conversation, where retrieval succeeds but the LLM fails to synthesize evidence distributed across turns.

Title:Lost in Conversation or Lost in Translation? Diagnosing Multi-Turn Degradation in RAG

Abstract:When conversing with large language models (LLMs), users often begin with a simple question and build towards a multi-hop question through follow-up turns. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and its graph-based variant (GraphRAG) have become the dominant approaches for grounding LLM responses in external evidence, yet both are evaluated almost exclusively on single-turn, fully specified queries. We systematically investigate this evaluation mismatch through a large-scale simulation study. Building on prior work on multi-turn LLM evaluation, we transform questions from multi-hop question answering (QA) benchmarks into underspecified conversations and evaluate ten LLM assistants with eight retrieval systems across 1.5 million simulated conversations. Our findings reveal that multi-turn interaction causes widespread performance degradation, incurring relative performance drops of up to 21% and increasing unreliability by 47%, making RAG systems simultaneously less accurate and less reliable. We identify two distinct failure modes behind this degradation. Systems are either lost in translation, where conversational rephrasing distorts the retrieval query, or lost in conversation, where retrieval succeeds but the LLM fails to synthesize evidence distributed across turns.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.36700 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.36700v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.36700 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 280 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe