analiza aiqbench
This research reveals a critical vulnerability where poisoning training data can reshape an LLM's loss landscape to force the memorization of specific, unseen private records. The study demonstrates that even differential privacy defenses may be bypassed by attacks directly targeting these local minima in the model's optimization surface. For security practitioners and researchers, this underscores the urgent need for robust mechanisms against gradient-based extraction threats beyond standard architectural hardening.
Loss Landscape Poisoning: Targeted Extraction of Unseen Training Data from LLMs
arXiv:2606.17110v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models are increasingly trained on proprietary or sensitive data, from private healthcare and financial records to user conversations containing secrets. Ensuring the privacy of such data against extraction attacks has become a central concern. In this paper, we ask whether an attacker who can poison a portion of the training data can facilitate the leakage of a separate target record they have no access to. We answer in the affirmative and show that such leakage can be induced by a poisoning mechanism that reshapes the model's local loss landscape around the target completion. Our key insight is that poisoning to create a sharp loss minimum at the target, surrounded by elevated loss on nearby alternatives, forces the model to memorize the target as the unique low-loss solution in its neighborhood. The attack requires no architectural changes, and generalizes across centralized and federated learning settings. We demonstrate that the attack amplifies privacy leakage across language (up to 100% successful extraction), and vision-language models (up 90% successful extraction). We show that the attack is thwarted when the model is trained to be differentially private. However, we introduce a new attack that directly probes the loss landscape bypassing even differential privacy defenses.
Abstract:Large Language Models are increasingly trained on proprietary or sensitive data, from private healthcare and financial records to user conversations containing secrets. Ensuring the privacy of such data against extraction attacks has become a central concern. In this paper, we ask whether an attacker who can poison a portion of the training data can facilitate the leakage of a separate target record they have no access to. We answer in the affirmative and show that such leakage can be induced by a poisoning mechanism that reshapes the model's local loss landscape around the target completion. Our key insight is that poisoning to create a sharp loss minimum at the target, surrounded by elevated loss on nearby alternatives, forces the model to memorize the target as the unique low-loss solution in its neighborhood. The attack requires no architectural changes, and generalizes across centralized and federated learning settings. We demonstrate that the attack amplifies privacy leakage across language (up to 100% successful extraction), and vision-language models (up 90% successful extraction). We show that the attack is thwarted when the model is trained to be differentially private. However, we introduce a new attack that directly probes the loss landscape bypassing even differential privacy defenses.
Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2606.17110 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2606.17110v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.17110 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 297 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Problems of Proliferation
LessWrong · 29 sept. 2026
Lock-In Risk Needs More Researchers; Here's Where to Start
LessWrong · 17 iun. 2026

Presentation: Exploding GPUs
InfoQ · 16 oct. 2026

How can LLM RL Work Despite Information-Theoretic Inefficiency
LessWrong · 16 oct. 2026