LoRA's Second Descent Extends Beyond Parameter Parity

arXiv:2610.04507v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Double descent has sparked considerable interest, with recent work relating it to the data, the model and the learning configuration. Practical fine-tuning commonly involves training a small adapter on top of frozen pretrained weights, as in low-rank adaptation (LoRA). The adapter's rank is the hyperparameter that sets its capacity, yet how this rank relates to double descent has not been well explored. We quantify this relation under label noise on four vision backbones and a 7B language model with a module-matched rank sweep (MMRS), which extends past full rank and compares every rank with dense fine-tuning of the same modules, paired by seed. On DeiT-Tiny, risk is lowest at rank one and rises sharply as the adapter becomes able to fit the noisy labels, forming an interpolation cliff. Past the peak, risk falls again, but every tested post-peak rank that still saves parameters remains above dense risk. Rank-one LoRA outperforms dense fine-tuning on three of the four vision backbones, consistent with strong regularization at small rank. LoRA thus exhibits a second descent, but matches dense risk only after losing its parameter advantage, first on DeiT-Tiny at four times dense's projection weights. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/lora-second-descent-C7B5.

Abstract:Double descent has sparked considerable interest, with recent work relating it to the data, the model and the learning configuration. Practical fine-tuning commonly involves training a small adapter on top of frozen pretrained weights, as in low-rank adaptation (LoRA). The adapter's rank is the hyperparameter that sets its capacity, yet how this rank relates to double descent has not been well explored. We quantify this relation under label noise on four vision backbones and a 7B language model with a module-matched rank sweep (MMRS), which extends past full rank and compares every rank with dense fine-tuning of the same modules, paired by seed. On DeiT-Tiny, risk is lowest at rank one and rises sharply as the adapter becomes able to fit the noisy labels, forming an interpolation cliff. Past the peak, risk falls again, but every tested post-peak rank that still saves parameters remains above dense risk. Rank-one LoRA outperforms dense fine-tuning on three of the four vision backbones, consistent with strong regularization at small rank. LoRA thus exhibits a second descent, but matches dense risk only after losing its parameter advantage, first on DeiT-Tiny at four times dense's projection weights. Code is available at this https URL.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.04507 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.04507v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.04507 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

analiza aiqbench

LoRA's Second Descent Extends Beyond Parameter Parity

Subiecte conexe