analiza aiqbench
This research addresses a critical optimization challenge in looped language models by introducing "Loop Dropout," a technique that mitigates late-loop bias during adapter training without incurring inference costs. By coupling stochastic masking with inverse-survival rescaling, the method ensures balanced adaptation across all recurrent steps, significantly enhancing performance in mathematical reasoning and code generation tasks. The approach represents a meaningful advancement in efficient fine-tuning strategies for recurrent architectures, offering improved generalization over existing LoRA variants.
Loop Dropout: Regularizing Shared Updates in Looped Language Models
arXiv:2609.34218v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Looped language models separate computational depth from parameter count by repeatedly applying the same transformer block. Adapting these models requires a shared update that remains effective as hidden states evolve throughout the recurrent computation. Our empirical analysis reveals a pronounced late-loop bias in standard low-rank adaptation (LoRA): the shared update is more effective at later loop positions. This imbalance motivates training shared updates under varying combinations of their applications. Randomly omitting adapter applications alone, however, does not improve task performance; it reduces expected update strength during training while leaving inference unchanged. We introduce Loop Dropout, which couples stochastic masking of adapter applications with inverse-survival rescaling to preserve expected update strength and promote effective adaptation across loops. Extensive experiments demonstrate improved mathematical reasoning across model sizes, adapter ranks and training recipes, with benefits extending to general instruction tuning and code generation. Loop Dropout outperforms existing LoRA variants and adapter regularizers, while further analysis shows stronger early-loop adaptation. Every backbone loop remains active, and inference applies the adapter at all loops using standard LoRA without additional trainable parameters or inference computation.
Abstract:Looped language models separate computational depth from parameter count by repeatedly applying the same transformer block. Adapting these models requires a shared update that remains effective as hidden states evolve throughout the recurrent computation. Our empirical analysis reveals a pronounced late-loop bias in standard low-rank adaptation (LoRA): the shared update is more effective at later loop positions. This imbalance motivates training shared updates under varying combinations of their applications. Randomly omitting adapter applications alone, however, does not improve task performance; it reduces expected update strength during training while leaving inference unchanged. We introduce Loop Dropout, which couples stochastic masking of adapter applications with inverse-survival rescaling to preserve expected update strength and promote effective adaptation across loops. Extensive experiments demonstrate improved mathematical reasoning across model sizes, adapter ranks and training recipes, with benefits extending to general instruction tuning and code generation. Loop Dropout outperforms existing LoRA variants and adapter regularizers, while further analysis shows stronger early-loop adaptation. Every backbone loop remains active, and inference applies the adapter at all loops using standard LoRA without additional trainable parameters or inference computation.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.34218 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.34218v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.34218 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 277 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
What's Continual Learning, and Why Might We Expect To See It In Advanced LLM Agents?
LessWrong · 12 iun. 2026

Why I Left Google DeepMind
LessWrong · 15 iul. 2026

Presentation: From Copy-Paste to Composition: Building Agents Like Real Software
InfoQ · 22 iul. 2026

Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · 25 sept. 2026