analiza aiqbench
This research addresses the critical challenge of hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) by introducing LookBack, a training-free scoring method that validates responses against their visual inputs rather than relying solely on textual confidence. By quantifying how strongly generated tokens reference image content, the approach significantly improves selection accuracy across multiple benchmarks with minimal computational overhead. This advancement is essential for building reliable multimodal systems where grounding in visual evidence is paramount.
LookBack: Where and How to Score LVLM Responses via Visual Reference Usage
arXiv:2608.11847v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) integrate visual perception with language generation, enabling responses that span image understanding and complex reasoning. However, LVLMs do not just inherit the text-level hallucinations; they also hallucinate against the image, producing fluent responses ungrounded in what they see. This makes LVLM response scoring inherently harder, and our diagnostics show that existing confidence-based metrics adopted from LLMs are insufficient for LVLMs. Specifically, removing the input image barely changes confidence-based selection, suggesting that output-space confidence primarily captures textual plausibility rather than agreement with the image. To address this gap, we propose LookBack, a training-free LVLM response scoring method that augments token likelihood with visual lookback score, a lightweight measure of how strongly each response token refers to image tokens. Across four benchmarks and three models, LookBack consistently improves Best-of-$N$ selection over existing baselines with negligible additional overhead.
Abstract:Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) integrate visual perception with language generation, enabling responses that span image understanding and complex reasoning. However, LVLMs do not just inherit the text-level hallucinations; they also hallucinate against the image, producing fluent responses ungrounded in what they see. This makes LVLM response scoring inherently harder, and our diagnostics show that existing confidence-based metrics adopted from LLMs are insufficient for LVLMs. Specifically, removing the input image barely changes confidence-based selection, suggesting that output-space confidence primarily captures textual plausibility rather than agreement with the image. To address this gap, we propose LookBack, a training-free LVLM response scoring method that augments token likelihood with visual lookback score, a lightweight measure of how strongly each response token refers to image tokens. Across four benchmarks and three models, LookBack consistently improves Best-of-$N$ selection over existing baselines with negligible additional overhead.
Findings of EMNLP 2026. 24 pages, 12 figures. Code: this https URL
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2608.11847 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2608.11847v2 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.11847 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 253 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Inference meta-monitoring for Amazon SageMaker AI endpoints with Amazon Quick
AWS · 30 iul. 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · 17 oct. 2026

Building multi-Region visualizations with Highcharts in Amazon Quick
AWS · 23 iul. 2026

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · 6 aug. 2026