Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This paper is about federated learning, a machine learning training paradigm, and its core contribution is an algorithmic stopping rule for local training epochs, so it passes the topic gate. Among the categories, Machine Learning fits best since the work is a training-method contribution with theory and benchmark evidence rather than a product, safety, or infrastructure piece. For readers, the practical takeaway is that FedStop trades a small mean-accuracy cost (at most one point) for gains in worst-decile accuracy on heterogeneous clients, with the main caveats being that the evidence is on CIFAR-10 and that the theoretical guarantees depend on the nested-decision assumption holding in practice.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Local Epochs as Optimal Stopping: Theory and Evidence in Federated Learning

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2610.21832v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: How long should each client train before communicating? Federated learning usually answers with a fixed, hand-tuned number of local epochs, yet an extra epoch helps only while the loss it removes outweighs the client drift it adds. We cast local training as finite-horizon optimal stopping: a client trains while the next epoch's expected loss reduction exceeds its priced squared drift. We prove that this one-stage look-ahead threshold is optimal whenever stopping decisions are nested, derive closed forms for geometric and power-law returns, and show that an estimated rule loses utility only through wrong-signed decisions. Epoch-level evidence supports the model's structure (geometric diminishing returns and additive drift) and reveals a simple regularity: the stage of training, not the client, sets the budget. The resulting rule, FedStop, is never more than one point below tuned FedAvg in mean accuracy. Where its budgets vary, it raises worst-decile accuracy by 4-8 points over tuned FedAvg and an adaptive-interval baseline, and every one of these gains remains significant after a Holm correction. Against the client-side stopping rules ALT and FLASH, it has the highest CIFAR-10 worst decile on every seed and is level elsewhere. It stays stable where per-client early stopping collapses, and each stopping decision takes constant time.

Abstract:How long should each client train before communicating? Federated learning usually answers with a fixed, hand-tuned number of local epochs, yet an extra epoch helps only while the loss it removes outweighs the client drift it adds. We cast local training as finite-horizon optimal stopping: a client trains while the next epoch's expected loss reduction exceeds its priced squared drift. We prove that this one-stage look-ahead threshold is optimal whenever stopping decisions are nested, derive closed forms for geometric and power-law returns, and show that an estimated rule loses utility only through wrong-signed decisions. Epoch-level evidence supports the model's structure (geometric diminishing returns and additive drift) and reveals a simple regularity: the stage of training, not the client, sets the budget. The resulting rule, FedStop, is never more than one point below tuned FedAvg in mean accuracy. Where its budgets vary, it raises worst-decile accuracy by 4-8 points over tuned FedAvg and an adaptive-interval baseline, and every one of these gains remains significant after a Holm correction. Against the client-side stopping rules ALT and FLASH, it has the highest CIFAR-10 worst decile on every seed and is level elsewhere. It stays stable where per-client early stopping collapses, and each stopping decision takes constant time.

27 pages, 7 figures, 18 tables. Includes appendices

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC)

arXiv:2610.21832 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.21832v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.21832 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 312 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe