analiza aiqbench
This research reframes Large Language Model evaluators as measurement instruments requiring rigorous metrological protocols, specifically addressing biases like "dark current" and positional false preferences. By decomposing stability from directionality in judge models, the study provides a critical framework for validating open-weight systems before downstream performance claims are made.
LLM Judges Have Dark Current: A Psychometric Datasheet for LLM-as-a-Judge Evaluation
arXiv:2606.15610v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-as-a-judge systems are now routinely used for open-ended model evaluation, where human preference annotation is costly, slow, and difficult to reproduce. Yet these judges are often reported as scalar accuracy, win-rate, or agreement devices. We argue that a judge should instead be reported as a measurement instrument. We introduce a Judge Datasheet protocol that measures dark current under true-vacuum inputs, stable cross-sensitivity to same-quality surface variation, positional false preference, target sensitivity on a controlled quality ladder, and the criterion or operating point induced by tie instructions. The direction-stability decomposition reveals that apparent Delta0 preference can be stable surface response or disguised position bias. In a three-judge open-weight case study, Llama-3.1-8B shows high dark current and presentation-conflicted Delta0 behavior, Qwen2.5-14B is vacuum-clean and target-sensitive but mixes stable and positional over-discrimination, and Qwen2.5-32B is vacuum-clean with low stable cross-sensitivity and low positional false preference. A strict tie criterion eliminates Qwen32B Delta0 false preference but absorbs marginal Delta1 target signals into ties while preserving Delta5 sensitivity. The results show that prompting moves the criterion, not the resolution. We do not claim that the downstream mechanism hypothesis that motivated this work is confirmed; the contribution is a metrological protocol for measuring the measuring device before downstream claims are made.
Abstract:LLM-as-a-judge systems are now routinely used for open-ended model evaluation, where human preference annotation is costly, slow, and difficult to reproduce. Yet these judges are often reported as scalar accuracy, win-rate, or agreement devices. We argue that a judge should instead be reported as a measurement instrument. We introduce a Judge Datasheet protocol that measures dark current under true-vacuum inputs, stable cross-sensitivity to same-quality surface variation, positional false preference, target sensitivity on a controlled quality ladder, and the criterion or operating point induced by tie instructions. The direction-stability decomposition reveals that apparent Delta0 preference can be stable surface response or disguised position bias. In a three-judge open-weight case study, Llama-3.1-8B shows high dark current and presentation-conflicted Delta0 behavior, Qwen2.5-14B is vacuum-clean and target-sensitive but mixes stable and positional over-discrimination, and Qwen2.5-32B is vacuum-clean with low stable cross-sensitivity and low positional false preference. A strict tie criterion eliminates Qwen32B Delta0 false preference but absorbs marginal Delta1 target signals into ties while preserving Delta5 sensitivity. The results show that prompting moves the criterion, not the resolution. We do not claim that the downstream mechanism hypothesis that motivated this work is confirmed; the contribution is a metrological protocol for measuring the measuring device before downstream claims are made.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2606.15610 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2606.15610v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.15610 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 236 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
LLM Judges Have Dark Current: Stratified Null and Utility Tests for LLM Judge Reliability
arXiv · 15 oct. 2026
Personas in a Pre-Internet Language Model
LessWrong · 13 oct. 2026

Does distilling Claude carry the persona with it?
LessWrong · 24 iul. 2026

How to Measure Intelligence Beyond Human Scale?
LessWrong · 31 iul. 2026