LLM-based User-Product Relevance Evaluation for Dynamic Product Advertising

arXiv:2610.14550v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Dynamic Product Advertising (DPA) retrieval systems are a core component of modern e-commerce advertising; however, their evaluation remains challenging. Conventional offline engagement metrics are limited by sparse, biased feedback, while online evaluation is costly and time-consuming. In this work, we propose a user--product relevance metric for offline evaluation of DPA retrieval systems. The metric first compresses the engagement history into a compact set of intent representatives via Semantic-ID-grouped, event-stratified segmentation, then assesses the relevance of a recommended product to each individual intent and aggregates them as a user-level relevance score, yielding a stable and interpretable measure of retrieval quality. To compute this metric at scale, we leverage large language models (LLMs) as semantic relevance judges, capturing nuanced functional and semantic relationships that heuristic methods often miss. We propose an agentic, human-aligned prompting framework that generates multi-category relevance guidelines and distills teacher-model judgments into an efficient student model for scalable evaluation. The resulting metric strongly correlates with offline and online business metrics, enabling faster and more reliable DPA retrieval iteration before A/B testing.

Abstract:Dynamic Product Advertising (DPA) retrieval systems are a core component of modern e-commerce advertising; however, their evaluation remains challenging. Conventional offline engagement metrics are limited by sparse, biased feedback, while online evaluation is costly and time-consuming. In this work, we propose a user--product relevance metric for offline evaluation of DPA retrieval systems. The metric first compresses the engagement history into a compact set of intent representatives via Semantic-ID-grouped, event-stratified segmentation, then assesses the relevance of a recommended product to each individual intent and aggregates them as a user-level relevance score, yielding a stable and interpretable measure of retrieval quality. To compute this metric at scale, we leverage large language models (LLMs) as semantic relevance judges, capturing nuanced functional and semantic relationships that heuristic methods often miss. We propose an agentic, human-aligned prompting framework that generates multi-category relevance guidelines and distills teacher-model judgments into an efficient student model for scalable evaluation. The resulting metric strongly correlates with offline and online business metrics, enabling faster and more reliable DPA retrieval iteration before A/B testing.

Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.14550 [cs.IR]

(or arXiv:2610.14550v1 [cs.IR] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.14550 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

analiza aiqbench

LLM-based User-Product Relevance Evaluation for Dynamic Product Advertising

Subiecte conexe