analiza aiqbench
This study demonstrates that entanglement provides no quantum advantage in target detection when the return phase is unknown, as unentangled coherent light already achieves the theoretical error-exponent bound under independent measurements. The finding effectively rules out several common receiver architectures—such as optical parametric amplifiers and phase-conjugate receivers—from offering a worst-case performance boost over classical methods in this specific scenario. For quantum sensing applications relying on illumination techniques, these results highlight critical practical constraints regarding phase stability that must be addressed to realize genuine quantum benefits.
Limits of independent and identical measurements for quantum illumination with an unknown return phase
arXiv:2608.13997v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Quantum illumination exploits entanglement between a transmitted signal and a retained idler to improve the error-probability exponent of target detection by roughly a factor of four (6 dB) over that with a coherent state of the same transmitted energy. This advantage presumes a known return phase. In practice, the phase is set by the range to the target and the condition of its surface, and is difficult to know in advance. Whether the advantage survives when this phase is unknown is not obvious. Here, we cast target detection as a composite hypothesis test in which the return phase is an unknown constant common to all trials, and we restrict the receiver to independent and identical measurements on each copy. We bound the worst-case error exponent at low reflectivity for every such measurement and every input state of a single signal mode and an idler of any dimension. We then show that unentangled coherent light with heterodyne detection already saturates this bound, for every value of the phase. Entanglement therefore confers no advantage in this setting. The class of independent and identical measurements contains many implementable quantum-illumination receivers, including the optical parametric amplifier and phase-conjugate receivers. Our result shows that none of them can offer a quantum advantage in the worst case over the phase, to leading order in the reflectivity.
Abstract:Quantum illumination exploits entanglement between a transmitted signal and a retained idler to improve the error-probability exponent of target detection by roughly a factor of four (6 dB) over that with a coherent state of the same transmitted energy. This advantage presumes a known return phase. In practice, the phase is set by the range to the target and the condition of its surface, and is difficult to know in advance. Whether the advantage survives when this phase is unknown is not obvious. Here, we cast target detection as a composite hypothesis test in which the return phase is an unknown constant common to all trials, and we restrict the receiver to independent and identical measurements on each copy. We bound the worst-case error exponent at low reflectivity for every such measurement and every input state of a single signal mode and an idler of any dimension. We then show that unentangled coherent light with heterodyne detection already saturates this bound, for every value of the phase. Entanglement therefore confers no advantage in this setting. The class of independent and identical measurements contains many implementable quantum-illumination receivers, including the optical parametric amplifier and phase-conjugate receivers. Our result shows that none of them can offer a quantum advantage in the worst case over the phase, to leading order in the reflectivity.
arXiv:2608.13997 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2608.13997v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.13997 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 311 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

AI and Quantum Computing Briefing
livetradingnews.com · 4 aug. 2026

Exploding variance of means of exponentials: least-squares to the rescue – Machine Learning Research Blog
francisbach.com · 27 sept. 2026

NISQ, What Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Means
Quantum Zeitgeist · 30 aug. 2026

Is The Brain A Quantum Computer? The Decoherence Numbers Say No
Quantum Zeitgeist · 13 sept. 2026