analiza aiqbench
This research reveals how decoder-only language models develop distinct word order biases depending on whether they are trained on artificial or natural languages, with data volume and resource quality driving a preference for SVO structures over time. The findings highlight that observed linguistic preferences in LLMs are not inherent to the architecture but emerge from training corpus composition, raising concerns about potential homogenization of language diversity as models scale.
Left-Branching Transformers Excel at Right-Branching Languages: Data Shapes Word Order Preferences in Language Models
arXiv:2608.15129v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We systematically compare word order preferences in decoder-only language models across 192 artificial languages and typologically diverse natural languages. On artificial languages, models exhibit a left-branching preference that aligns with neither natural language universals nor human word order learning biases. On natural languages, monolingual models show no clear base word order bias at small scales, but as data grows, a preference for right-branching subject-verb-object (SVO) languages emerges while SOV falls behind despite being the most frequent order cross-linguistically. This SVO advantage extends to multilingual models and correlates with language resource level and data quality rather than word order. Thus, the same architecture exhibits opposite preferences on artificial and natural languages, establishing that word order biases observed in practice are data-driven. Since highly-resourced languages are overwhelmingly SVO, these biases risk gradually reducing word order diversity, particularly in languages that productively use multiple word orders, with the widespread adoption of LLMs.
Abstract:We systematically compare word order preferences in decoder-only language models across 192 artificial languages and typologically diverse natural languages. On artificial languages, models exhibit a left-branching preference that aligns with neither natural language universals nor human word order learning biases. On natural languages, monolingual models show no clear base word order bias at small scales, but as data grows, a preference for right-branching subject-verb-object (SVO) languages emerges while SOV falls behind despite being the most frequent order cross-linguistically. This SVO advantage extends to multilingual models and correlates with language resource level and data quality rather than word order. Thus, the same architecture exhibits opposite preferences on artificial and natural languages, establishing that word order biases observed in practice are data-driven. Since highly-resourced languages are overwhelmingly SVO, these biases risk gradually reducing word order diversity, particularly in languages that productively use multiple word orders, with the widespread adoption of LLMs.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.15129 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2608.15129v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.15129 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 247 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · 24 sept. 2026

2026.5: We're on the same frequency now 📡
Home Assistant · 6 mai 2026

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · 27 aug. 2026

Academia is for Ambition — Alex Zhang, MIT
Latent Space · 2 oct. 2026