Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This paper introduces a theoretical framework called Repeated Reinforcement with Persistent Forgetting (RPF) that reframes neural network forgetting as an active selection mechanism rather than a failure mode. By modeling how repeated exposure reinforces recurring patterns while attenuation suppresses weak signals, the study links these dynamics to Minimum Description Length compression principles. Controlled experiments on scalar memories and nonlinear networks validate this approach as a controllable source of inductive bias independent of architecture or scale.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Learning Under Forgetting: Statistical Support-Selective Retention in Stochastic Training Dynamics

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2609.38768v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Prior work has shown that neural networks exhibit implicit biases toward low-complexity structure (e.g., spectral bias), memorization dynamics, and compression-like effects during training, but a unified dynamical account of selective retention remains incomplete. We propose Repeated Reinforcement with Persistent Forgetting (RPF) dynamics, a minimal framework in which repeated exposure reinforces patterns and structures that recur in the data, while persistent forgetting attenuates learned information. This view treats forgetting not merely as a failure mode, but as a selection mechanism. We build the theory in three successive layers. First, in an independent-feature model, we derive an exposure-selective survival law and a support-dependent retention boundary characterizing which patterns persist under forgetting. Second, in a shared-parameter model, we show that forgetting induces spectral filtering over covariance modes, preserving strongly supported shared components while suppressing weak ones. Third, under small-step and norm/coding approximations, we show how RPF dynamics induce an implicit trade-off between data fitting and the cost of stored information, yielding Minimum Description Length (MDL)-like compression. Controlled experiments provide evidence for this reinforcement--forgetting selection mechanism in scalar memories and a nonlinear shared network. Joint reinforcement and attenuation interventions shift conditional retention, while matched exposure counts reveal forgetting-dependent effects of reinforcement timing and changes in the composition of the retained set. Together, these results show that repeated reinforcement and persistent forgetting jointly provide a controllable source of inductive bias beyond neural architecture and scale.

Abstract:Prior work has shown that neural networks exhibit implicit biases toward low-complexity structure (e.g., spectral bias), memorization dynamics, and compression-like effects during training, but a unified dynamical account of selective retention remains incomplete. We propose Repeated Reinforcement with Persistent Forgetting (RPF) dynamics, a minimal framework in which repeated exposure reinforces patterns and structures that recur in the data, while persistent forgetting attenuates learned information. This view treats forgetting not merely as a failure mode, but as a selection mechanism. We build the theory in three successive layers. First, in an independent-feature model, we derive an exposure-selective survival law and a support-dependent retention boundary characterizing which patterns persist under forgetting. Second, in a shared-parameter model, we show that forgetting induces spectral filtering over covariance modes, preserving strongly supported shared components while suppressing weak ones. Third, under small-step and norm/coding approximations, we show how RPF dynamics induce an implicit trade-off between data fitting and the cost of stored information, yielding Minimum Description Length (MDL)-like compression. Controlled experiments provide evidence for this reinforcement--forgetting selection mechanism in scalar memories and a nonlinear shared network. Joint reinforcement and attenuation interventions shift conditional retention, while matched exposure counts reveal forgetting-dependent effects of reinforcement timing and changes in the composition of the retained set. Together, these results show that repeated reinforcement and persistent forgetting jointly provide a controllable source of inductive bias beyond neural architecture and scale.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.38768 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.38768v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.38768 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

experimental_evidence/README.txt

experimental_evidence/SHA256SUMS.json

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/conditional_phase_diagram.py

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/coupling_analysis.py

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/figures/coupling/competition_models.png

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/figures/coupling/factorial_interaction.png

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/figures/full/boundary_scaling.png

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/figures/full/conditional_control.png

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/figures/full/phase_diagram.png

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/figures/full/ratio_organization.png

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/figures/full/support_curves.png

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/figures/schedule_coupling/selection_tradeoff.png

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/figures/schedule_coupling/temporal_coupling.png

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/results/coupling/coupling_summary.json

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/results/coupling/cross_validation_folds.csv

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/results/coupling/cross_validation_summary.csv

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/results/coupling/interaction_cells.csv

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/results/coupling/interaction_model_sensitivity.csv

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/results/coupling/replay_gain_by_decay.csv

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/results/full/analysis_summary.json

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/results/full/config.json

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/results/full/environment.json

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/results/full/phase_table.csv

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/results/full/run_summary.csv

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/results/full/threshold_sensitivity.csv

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/results/full/token_metrics.csv

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/results/schedule_coupling/analysis_summary.json

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/results/schedule_coupling/config.json

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/results/schedule_coupling/environment.json

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/results/schedule_coupling/paired_contrast_summary.csv

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/results/schedule_coupling/paired_contrasts.csv

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/results/schedule_coupling/run_summary.csv

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/results/schedule_coupling/sample_counts.csv

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/results/schedule_coupling/sequence_metadata.json

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/results/schedule_coupling/token_metrics.csv

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/results/schedule_coupling/trajectory.csv

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/schedule_coupling_experiment.py

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/verify_coupling_results.py

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/verify_results.py

experimental_evidence/conditional_tinylm/verify_theory_coupling.py

experimental_evidence/factorized/code/factorized_generalization_experiment.py

experimental_evidence/factorized/figures/factorized_generalization.png

experimental_evidence/factorized/results/factorized/analysis_summary.json

experimental_evidence/factorized/results/factorized/config.json

experimental_evidence/factorized/results/factorized/environment.json

experimental_evidence/factorized/results/factorized/pair_design.csv

experimental_evidence/factorized/results/factorized/paired_replay_summary.csv

experimental_evidence/factorized/results/factorized/run_summary.csv

experimental_evidence/reproduce_figures/scripts/build_figures_tables.py

(44 additional files not shown) You must enabled JavaScript to view entire file list.

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 390 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe