Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCercetare AI

analiza aiqbench

This research formalizes transfer learning by explicitly defining structural invariants using category theory, specifically left Kan extensions, to measure how well learned representations generalize across task changes. By quantifying the discrepancy between predicted and observed target invariants via bottleneck distances on persistence modules, the study offers a rigorous mathematical framework for evaluating representation robustness beyond standard accuracy metrics.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Learning Transfers: Kan Extensions for Neural Invariants

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2606.07627v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Transfer learning presumes that a representation learned on a source task carries structure that remains usable on a related target task. Standard evaluations probe this through target accuracy or a distributional discrepancy, without stating which structural invariant should survive the change of task. We make that invariant explicit and computable. We model a task as a small category: its objects are the task's components, such as data domains or class labels, and its morphisms are the admissible relations between them, such as the comparison of a coarse class with a fine class refining it. A change of task is a functor $J:\mathcal A\to\mathcal B$ from the source task category to the target task category, recording where each component is sent and which are thereby identified. A trained representation is summarised by a functor $F:\mathcal{A}\to\mathcal{V}$ into a category of invariants, e.g. the persistent homology of its latent point cloud per component. The target must then exhibit the left Kan extension $\operatorname{Lan}_JF$, the universal extension of $F$ along $J$. For an observed target invariant $G:\mathcal B\to\mathcal V$ we define the transfer discrepancy $\operatorname{Comp}_J(F,G)=\sup_{b\in\operatorname{Ob}(\mathcal B)}d_{\mathcal V}((\operatorname{Lan}_JF)(b),G(b))$, scoring transfer against the invariant $J$ forces, not the source itself. We prove finite cokernel formulas for $(\operatorname{Lan}_JF)(b)$ over the comma category $J\downarrow b$, in chain complexes and persistence modules, and for finite-type one-parameter persistence it equals the bottleneck distance between barcodes exactly. Controlled experiments on neural latent point clouds test whether the score recovers the correct change of task and flags representation collapses that preserve accuracy while destroying transfer-relevant topology.

Abstract:Transfer learning presumes that a representation learned on a source task carries structure that remains usable on a related target task. Standard evaluations probe this through target accuracy or a distributional discrepancy, without stating which structural invariant should survive the change of task. We make that invariant explicit and computable. We model a task as a small category: its objects are the task's components, such as data domains or class labels, and its morphisms are the admissible relations between them, such as the comparison of a coarse class with a fine class refining it. A change of task is a functor $J:\mathcal A\to\mathcal B$ from the source task category to the target task category, recording where each component is sent and which are thereby identified. A trained representation is summarised by a functor $F:\mathcal{A}\to\mathcal{V}$ into a category of invariants, e.g. the persistent homology of its latent point cloud per component. The target must then exhibit the left Kan extension $\operatorname{Lan}_JF$, the universal extension of $F$ along $J$. For an observed target invariant $G:\mathcal B\to\mathcal V$ we define the transfer discrepancy $\operatorname{Comp}_J(F,G)=\sup_{b\in\operatorname{Ob}(\mathcal B)}d_{\mathcal V}((\operatorname{Lan}_JF)(b),G(b))$, scoring transfer against the invariant $J$ forces, not the source itself. We prove finite cokernel formulas for $(\operatorname{Lan}_JF)(b)$ over the comma category $J\downarrow b$, in chain complexes and persistence modules, and for finite-type one-parameter persistence it equals the bottleneck distance between barcodes exactly. Controlled experiments on neural latent point clouds test whether the score recovers the correct change of task and flags representation collapses that preserve accuracy while destroying transfer-relevant topology.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Algebraic Topology (math.AT); Category Theory (math.CT)

arXiv:2606.07627 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2606.07627v2 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.07627 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 352 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe