analiza aiqbench
This research introduces "Frontier Learning," a framework that optimizes model selection under distribution shift by combining internal representations from white-box models with outputs from black-box candidates. The approach guarantees performance at least as good as any individual baseline, such as zero-shot reuse or direct fine-tuning, particularly when no single strategy performs reliably across varying shifts. By treating diverse pretrained models as complementary information sources rather than mutually exclusive options, the method offers a robust solution for deploying foundation models in dynamic environments like clinical settings and visual domain adaptation tasks.
Learning the Pareto Frontier of Predictive Models under Distribution Shift
arXiv:2608.00632v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern machine learning pipelines increasingly rely on reusing pretrained and foundation models across downstream tasks. These pretrained models can differ not only in performance but also in how they can be used: some only provide black-box predictions, while others may permit white-box access to internal representations that can be probed or fine-tuned. When deployed to the target domain in the presence of distribution shift, no single strategy, including zero-shot application, fine-tuning, or directly training a target-specific model, is uniformly the best. In this work, we propose Frontier Learning, a framework that treats a library of candidate models spanning different training histories and access regimes as complementary sources of information rather than mutually exclusive alternatives. Frontier Learning constructs a unified target-domain feature by concatenating internal representations from white-box candidates as well as prediction outputs from black-box candidates, then fits a lightweight, regularized supervised learner on this concatenated representation using labeled target data. Because the resulting hypothesis class contains predictors obtained by zero-shot reuse, fine-tuning, and direct training as special cases, empirical risk minimization over the frontier learner is guaranteed to be no worse, on the training sample, than any individual baseline. We evaluate the framework in simulations spanning varying degrees of source-target compatibility and in two real-world distribution-shift settings: visual domain adaptation on DomainNet/VisDA and clinical mortality prediction across intensive care unit domains using MIMIC-IV-Notes. Across all settings, Frontier Learning matches or outperforms the strongest individual reuse strategy, with the largest gains arising precisely when no single baseline is reliable across the range of shift considered.
Abstract:Modern machine learning pipelines increasingly rely on reusing pretrained and foundation models across downstream tasks. These pretrained models can differ not only in performance but also in how they can be used: some only provide black-box predictions, while others may permit white-box access to internal representations that can be probed or fine-tuned. When deployed to the target domain in the presence of distribution shift, no single strategy, including zero-shot application, fine-tuning, or directly training a target-specific model, is uniformly the best. In this work, we propose Frontier Learning, a framework that treats a library of candidate models spanning different training histories and access regimes as complementary sources of information rather than mutually exclusive alternatives. Frontier Learning constructs a unified target-domain feature by concatenating internal representations from white-box candidates as well as prediction outputs from black-box candidates, then fits a lightweight, regularized supervised learner on this concatenated representation using labeled target data. Because the resulting hypothesis class contains predictors obtained by zero-shot reuse, fine-tuning, and direct training as special cases, empirical risk minimization over the frontier learner is guaranteed to be no worse, on the training sample, than any individual baseline. We evaluate the framework in simulations spanning varying degrees of source-target compatibility and in two real-world distribution-shift settings: visual domain adaptation on DomainNet/VisDA and clinical mortality prediction across intensive care unit domains using MIMIC-IV-Notes. Across all settings, Frontier Learning matches or outperforms the strongest individual reuse strategy, with the largest gains arising precisely when no single baseline is reliable across the range of shift considered.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2608.00632 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.00632v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.00632 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 352 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Jev: System One models for Prod, not God — with Diogo Almeida, CEO, TypeSafe AI
Latent Space · 21 sept. 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 3 oct. 2026

Claude Code’s Next Era — Thariq Shihipar, Anthropic
Latent Space · 29 sept. 2026
Untrusted advice for AI control: Short, strong advice significantly uplifts weak LLMs
LessWrong · 27 iul. 2026