analiza aiqbench
This research addresses a critical gap in large language models where they infer mental states but fail to execute corresponding actions, proposing a solution via explicit perception-to-action rules trained with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). By applying this method to Qwen2.5 and Llama3, the study demonstrates improved Theory-of-Mind reasoning and successful knowledge transfer to smaller models like GPT-4o-mini, highlighting the efficacy of structured rule generation over standard prompting or fine-tuning.
Learning Perception to Action Rules through Reinforcement Learning for Theory-of-Mind Reasoning
arXiv:2610.19796v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In Theory-of-Mind (ToM) reasoning, large language models may correctly infer the agent's mental state but fail to use that inference when predicting or judging the agent's subsequent actions. In this work, we investigate whether explicitly connecting perception, belief, and action with rules improves ToM reasoning. We generate concise \textit{if--then} rules that express relations between perception to action and use Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) to train Qwen2.5 and Llama3 models across four ToM benchmarks. GRPO with rule generation outperforms prompting, supervised fine-tuning, and think reasoning. Moreover, rules generated by larger models ($\geq$3B) provide transferable knowledge that improves downstream performance of GPT-4o-mini. These findings suggest that explicit rules help models bridge the reasoning gap in ToM and support knowledge transfer across models.
Abstract:In Theory-of-Mind (ToM) reasoning, large language models may correctly infer the agent's mental state but fail to use that inference when predicting or judging the agent's subsequent actions. In this work, we investigate whether explicitly connecting perception, belief, and action with rules improves ToM reasoning. We generate concise \textit{if--then} rules that express relations between perception to action and use Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) to train Qwen2.5 and Llama3 models across four ToM benchmarks. GRPO with rule generation outperforms prompting, supervised fine-tuning, and think reasoning. Moreover, rules generated by larger models ($\geq$3B) provide transferable knowledge that improves downstream performance of GPT-4o-mini. These findings suggest that explicit rules help models bridge the reasoning gap in ToM and support knowledge transfer across models.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.19796 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.19796v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.19796 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 219 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · 12 oct. 2026
Assessing Information Ecosystems : How Governments Can Get Ahead of Hybrid Threats
carnegieendowment.org · 5 aug. 2026

The Alignment Problem: Computer Science Meets Analytic Philosophy
LessWrong · 18 oct. 2026

RL & search is a terrifying way to build AGI (an FAQ)
AI Alignment Forum · 27 iul. 2026