analiza aiqbench
This research introduces a rigorous framework for synthetic-augmented inference, specifically addressing the bias risks inherent in treating large language model outputs as real data samples. By defining a "size-weight frontier," the authors establish finite-sample coverage guarantees that allow practitioners to safely narrow confidence intervals when augmenting scarce datasets with AI-generated responses. The study demonstrates significant practical utility in opinion survey analysis, offering a methodological advance for reliable statistical inference in data-scarce environments.
Learning a Size-Weight Frontier for Synthetic-Augmented Inference
arXiv:2608.28576v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Synthetic data can improve statistical inference when real data are scarce, but naively treating synthetic samples as real data can introduce bias and lead to unreliable inference. We develop a general framework for synthetic-augmented inference across a population of related tasks. It characterizes synthetic augmentation by the number of synthetic observations and their weight. Central to our framework is a size-weight frontier that specifies, for each weight, the largest synthetic sample size for which all smaller sizes attain the target task-marginal coverage. We estimate this frontier from historical tasks, and establish a finite-sample coverage guarantee simultaneously for all size-weight configurations on or below the estimated frontier. In experiments using large language model responses to augment opinion survey data, our procedure achieves target coverage and substantially narrows confidence intervals.
Abstract:Synthetic data can improve statistical inference when real data are scarce, but naively treating synthetic samples as real data can introduce bias and lead to unreliable inference. We develop a general framework for synthetic-augmented inference across a population of related tasks. It characterizes synthetic augmentation by the number of synthetic observations and their weight. Central to our framework is a size-weight frontier that specifies, for each weight, the largest synthetic sample size for which all smaller sizes attain the target task-marginal coverage. We estimate this frontier from historical tasks, and establish a finite-sample coverage guarantee simultaneously for all size-weight configurations on or below the estimated frontier. In experiments using large language model responses to augment opinion survey data, our procedure achieves target coverage and substantially narrows confidence intervals.
Methodology (stat.ME); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2608.28576 [stat.ME]
(or arXiv:2608.28576v1 [stat.ME] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.28576 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 230 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 3 oct. 2026

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · 5 oct. 2026
What's Continual Learning, and Why Might We Expect To See It In Advanced LLM Agents?
LessWrong · 12 iun. 2026

The generative AI customization spectrum: From prompt engineering to custom models on AWS
AWS · 14 sept. 2026