analiza aiqbench
This research introduces ProKDA, a novel training strategy that decouples explanation generation from label prediction in multimodal models to improve hateful meme detection. By sequentially aligning background knowledge with decision-making, the method overcomes task interference common in joint optimization approaches, yielding state-of-the-art performance on public benchmarks. The work advances explainable AI safety by providing robust, evidence-supported moderation tools for online communities.
Learn Before You Judge: Progressive Knowledge-to-Decision Alignment for Explainable Hateful Meme Detection
arXiv:2609.19778v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hateful memes spread abusive content through implicit interactions between images and text, posing serious threats to the safety of online communities. In recent years, multimodal large language models have been widely used for hateful meme detection and are increasingly adopted to generate explainable detection results. However, we find that existing explain-then-detect methods often couple explanation generation and label prediction within the same training process. This coupling causes interference between task objectives, leading to limited detection performance and even worse results than simple SFT baselines. To address these challenges, we propose ProKDA, a progressive knowledge-to-decision alignment method for explainable hateful meme detection. Inspired by the human annotation training process, ProKDA first uses an agentic background knowledge construction pipeline to obtain external knowledge related to meme understanding. It then adopts a three-stage training strategy that sequentially performs background knowledge learning, hatefulness detection learning, and hatefulness boundary alignment. Unlike prior explain-then-detect methods that jointly optimize both tasks, ProKDA focuses on a single training objective at each stage. This design reduces interference between the two tasks and progressively transforms background knowledge into robust detection decisions. Experiments on three public hateful meme benchmarks show that ProKDA achieves state-of-the-art detection performance and provides accurate, explainable, and evidence-supported decisions for hateful meme moderation. Project page: https://meizhiyuan88666.github.io/prokda.
Abstract:Hateful memes spread abusive content through implicit interactions between images and text, posing serious threats to the safety of online communities. In recent years, multimodal large language models have been widely used for hateful meme detection and are increasingly adopted to generate explainable detection results. However, we find that existing explain-then-detect methods often couple explanation generation and label prediction within the same training process. This coupling causes interference between task objectives, leading to limited detection performance and even worse results than simple SFT baselines. To address these challenges, we propose ProKDA, a progressive knowledge-to-decision alignment method for explainable hateful meme detection. Inspired by the human annotation training process, ProKDA first uses an agentic background knowledge construction pipeline to obtain external knowledge related to meme understanding. It then adopts a three-stage training strategy that sequentially performs background knowledge learning, hatefulness detection learning, and hatefulness boundary alignment. Unlike prior explain-then-detect methods that jointly optimize both tasks, ProKDA focuses on a single training objective at each stage. This design reduces interference between the two tasks and progressively transforms background knowledge into robust detection decisions. Experiments on three public hateful meme benchmarks show that ProKDA achieves state-of-the-art detection performance and provides accurate, explainable, and evidence-supported decisions for hateful meme moderation. Project page: this https URL.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.19778 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.19778v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.19778 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 306 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Deconfusing Corrigibility
AI Alignment Forum · 17 oct. 2026

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · 3 aug. 2026

Microsoft’s AI chief says superintelligence is near, but won’t take your job
The Verge · 8 iun. 2026
The Three Filters: Why Almost Every Plan to Survive ASI Fails Miserably
LessWrong · 10 iun. 2026