analiza aiqbench
LayerRAG-Bench introduces a rigorous framework for evaluating agentic RAG systems by isolating failures across evidence, tool-contract, authorization, and session-state layers rather than relying solely on superficial groundedness metrics. The study demonstrates that while schema normalization effectively resolves drift issues, it fails to address critical reliability gaps like stale data or permission denials, necessitating layer-specific interventions for robust enterprise deployment.
LayerRAG-Bench: A Cross-Layer Reliability Benchmark for Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation
arXiv:2607.27353v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic retrieval-augmented generation systems can produce answers that appear grounded while failing at the evidence, tool-contract, authorization, or session-state layer. We introduce LayerRAG-Bench, a controlled cross-layer reliability benchmark with 8 enterprise domains, 240 tasks, 9 fault scenarios, 2 contract modes, and 38,880 live task-level records across nine models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Gemini. Schema normalization raises schema-drift success from 0.000 to 0.913, but stale evidence, missing tool output, denied permissions, and wrong-session context are not recovered by schema normalization. Groundedness-only evaluation also produces substantial false positives under stale and wrong-session evidence. These results support a layer-specific evaluation principle: a reliability intervention should be credited for repairing its target layer without being mistaken for a universal fix.
Abstract:Agentic retrieval-augmented generation systems can produce answers that appear grounded while failing at the evidence, tool-contract, authorization, or session-state layer. We introduce LayerRAG-Bench, a controlled cross-layer reliability benchmark with 8 enterprise domains, 240 tasks, 9 fault scenarios, 2 contract modes, and 38,880 live task-level records across nine models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Gemini. Schema normalization raises schema-drift success from 0.000 to 0.913, but stale evidence, missing tool output, denied permissions, and wrong-session context are not recovered by schema normalization. Groundedness-only evaluation also produces substantial false positives under stale and wrong-session evidence. These results support a layer-specific evaluation principle: a reliability intervention should be credited for repairing its target layer without being mistaken for a universal fix.
10 pages, 9 tables. Code and data: this https URL
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2607.27353 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2607.27353v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.27353 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 221 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 3 oct. 2026

[AINews] Agents disprove Polysemanticity; greatly improve Interpretability & Alignment
Latent Space · 16 oct. 2026

[AINews] Muse Spark 1.3 matches GPT-5.6-Sol, confirming Meta Superintelligence as the newest Frontier Lab, >90% discount for training
Latent Space · 3 sept. 2026
Introducing North Mini Code: Cohere’s First Model For Developers
Hugging Face · 9 iun. 2026