analiza aiqbench
The Lattice Deduction Transformer (LDT) represents a significant advancement in reasoning models by integrating logical constraint solving directly into the transformer architecture via lattice projections. This approach achieves near-perfect accuracy on complex logic puzzles like Sudoku-Extreme while drastically reducing training compute requirements compared to prior recurrent reasoners. The work demonstrates that domain-agnostic supervision through abstract interpretation can effectively generalize deductive capabilities without task-specific fine-tuning.
Lattice Deduction Transformers
arXiv:2605.08605v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We introduce the Lattice Deduction Transformer (LDT), a recurrent transformer that approximates logically sound deduction by projecting its latent state through a lattice between forward passes. We train on-policy in a process that mirrors deduction in a search-based constraint solver and supervise training via a domain-agnostic approximation of the set of solution candidates based on abstract interpretation. An $800$K-parameter LDT outperforms prior small recurrent reasoners on Sudoku-Extreme with under $2\%$ of their estimated training FLOPs, solving $99.999\%$ of the $422{,}786$ test puzzles. The model is nearly always sound, in that it gives a wrong answer for $4$ of $1.27$M puzzle evaluations, and otherwise returns a correct answer or abstains. A $1.8$M-parameter LDT variant reaches $99.8\%$ accuracy on Maze-Hard. Our code is available at github.com/lcrh/lattice-deduction-transformers.
Abstract:We introduce the Lattice Deduction Transformer (LDT), a recurrent transformer that approximates logically sound deduction by projecting its latent state through a lattice between forward passes. We train on-policy in a process that mirrors deduction in a search-based constraint solver and supervise training via a domain-agnostic approximation of the set of solution candidates based on abstract interpretation. An $800$K-parameter LDT outperforms prior small recurrent reasoners on Sudoku-Extreme with under $2\%$ of their estimated training FLOPs, solving $99.999\%$ of the $422{,}786$ test puzzles. The model is nearly always sound, in that it gives a wrong answer for $4$ of $1.27$M puzzle evaluations, and otherwise returns a correct answer or abstains. A $1.8$M-parameter LDT variant reaches $99.8\%$ accuracy on Maze-Hard. Our code is available at this http URL.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
arXiv:2605.08605 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2605.08605v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.08605 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 226 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
The Scaling Properties of Implicit Deductive Reasoning in Transformers
arXiv · 29 iul. 2026
Anatomy of a Sound Neural Reasoner: One-Shot Amortization, First-Pass Poisoning, and Search Inertness in Clue-Rich Completion
arXiv · 23 iul. 2026
Hakken: Predicting future discoveries to fill the gaps in today's knowledge
arXiv · 7 sept. 2026
Probabilistic Extension of Neuro-Symbolic AGI Robots based on Belnap's Typed Intensional FOL
arXiv · 21 iul. 2026