analiza aiqbench
This research introduces KoNA, a benchmark addressing the critical gap in evaluating vision-language models' ability to selectively refuse specific unsafe or unanswerable components within complex queries. By fine-tuning models on this nuanced dataset, the study demonstrates significant improvements in distinguishing between answerable and non-compliant parts of a request without degrading overall utility. This advancement is essential for deploying robust AI systems that can navigate real-world scenarios where queries often mix valid information with potential hazards.
Knowing What Not to Answer: Selective Non-Compliance in Vision-Language Models
arXiv:2609.04720v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) are expected to respond helpfully to appropriate requests while withholding compliance with requests that are incorrect, unsafe, infeasible, or unanswerable. However, existing benchmarks predominantly evaluate non-compliance at the level of the query as a whole, assuming that each request either warrants compliance or requires withholding compliance. In practice, real-world queries can contain a mixture of answerable content and components for which compliance should be withheld. In this paper, we introduce KoNA, a benchmark for evaluating selective non-compliance in VLMs across five categories: False Premise, Visual Inaccessibility, Universal Unknown, Task Feasibility, and Safety. Each task evaluates two capabilities: query-level non-compliance and component-level non-compliance under paired single and compound queries. Our evaluation across diverse VLMs shows that models often fail to refuse, correct, or abstain appropriately, and these failures become more pronounced when queries require selective non-compliance. To address this challenge, we fine-tune VLMs using KoNA examples that require selective non-compliance, together with a fully answerable set that should receive direct answers. Our fine-tuned models achieve substantial improvements in non-compliance accuracy while largely maintaining performance on fully answerable tasks. These results suggest that the fine-tuned models can distinguish between answerable components and those requiring non-compliance and respond in a task-appropriate manner.
Abstract:Vision-language models (VLMs) are expected to respond helpfully to appropriate requests while withholding compliance with requests that are incorrect, unsafe, infeasible, or unanswerable. However, existing benchmarks predominantly evaluate non-compliance at the level of the query as a whole, assuming that each request either warrants compliance or requires withholding compliance. In practice, real-world queries can contain a mixture of answerable content and components for which compliance should be withheld. In this paper, we introduce KoNA, a benchmark for evaluating selective non-compliance in VLMs across five categories: False Premise, Visual Inaccessibility, Universal Unknown, Task Feasibility, and Safety. Each task evaluates two capabilities: query-level non-compliance and component-level non-compliance under paired single and compound queries. Our evaluation across diverse VLMs shows that models often fail to refuse, correct, or abstain appropriately, and these failures become more pronounced when queries require selective non-compliance. To address this challenge, we fine-tune VLMs using KoNA examples that require selective non-compliance, together with a fully answerable set that should receive direct answers. Our fine-tuned models achieve substantial improvements in non-compliance accuracy while largely maintaining performance on fully answerable tasks. These results suggest that the fine-tuned models can distinguish between answerable components and those requiring non-compliance and respond in a task-appropriate manner.
EMNLP 2026 Main Conference (43 pages). Code and dataset available at this https URL
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.04720 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.04720v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.04720 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 314 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · 31 iul. 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · 18 sept. 2026
A Red Line and Oversight Framework for Government AI Contracts
AI Alignment Forum · 18 iul. 2026

Sweep thousands of leases for compliance using Amazon Quick and the Adjudicated Query pattern
AWS · 2 oct. 2026