analiza aiqbench
This paper establishes a theoretical separation in parallel sampling complexity by comparing two divergence criteria: one averaging over schedules and another evaluating the output law directly. The results demonstrate that for specific distributions like uniform binary strings, these approaches yield fundamentally different round complexities, ranging from quadratic to double-logarithmic orders. This distinction provides critical insight into optimizing causal randomized policies for high-dimensional sampling tasks in machine learning systems.
KL Before and After Mixing: A Round-Complexity Separation in Parallel Sampling
arXiv:2610.13924v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A parallel sampler can choose at random which coordinates to generate together. For a target $p$ and the output law $q_U$ of a schedule $U$ drawn afresh for each output, we compare the schedule-averaged divergence $\mathbb{E}_U D_{\mathrm{KL}}(p\|q_U)$ with the output-law divergence $D_{\mathrm{KL}}(p\|\mathbb{E}_U q_U)$, in nats. Rounds commit independent draws from exact conditional marginals frozen at the round's start, each output's schedule is drawn before sampling from a finite mixture of schedules, and every scheduled round is charged. For the uniform distribution on binary strings of even length $n$ with $n/2$ ones, the least expected number of rounds at a fixed tolerance $\varepsilon>0$ is $\Theta_\varepsilon((\log n)^2)$ under the first criterion but $(e^{-\varepsilon}+o(1))\log_2\ln n$ under the second, and the double-logarithmic order is attainable with the same round count on every run. For this target, a count-state recursion gives the exact least output divergence at every round cap over all causal randomized policies. The separation extends to weighted fixed-count targets with bounded weight ratios and quota fractions bounded away from zero and one, without permutation symmetry, and to the full-support Beta$(1,1)$--Bernoulli target, where the sharp expected cost under the output-law criterion is $(e^{-\varepsilon}/2+o(1))\log_2\log_2n$, attained with rare $n$-round runs. Prior work implies the order of the schedule-averaged cost on the balanced target and its $O_\varepsilon((\log n)^2)$ upper bounds on both extensions.
Citește articolul complet pe arXivSubiecte conexe

GEM Training: How Meta Doubled the Efficiency of Its LLM-Scale Ads Foundation Model
Meta Engineering · 3 aug. 2026

Frontier post-training recipe review with Finbarr Timbers
Interconnects · 16 iun. 2026

Informe de riesgos de la IA de frontera (febrero–marzo de 2026)
METR · 19 mai 2026

Frontier AI Risk Report (February–March 2026)
METR · 19 mai 2026